As far as site vision and oblgations go, each and every answerer, questioner, and reader has their own agenda. The site is not set in stone. It can do a 360 just because of one twitter post about some fluff to do with HNQ.
So while people get up in arms about the primary objective being the site...
I'm doing the same tasks as what they call 'seniors' but they only got these roles through internal promotions for being here for years. None of them have IT backgrounds but fell into IT when degrees and education didn't matter so much.
My manager asks them "How long would it take you for this?" then they give a time period then she doubles it for me but I do it in half then just end up sitting because she doesn't expect it
Yea after meeting summer, I've definitely decided I'm not naming any of my kids after seasons, poor persons would have to live with this **** for the rest of their lives.
yes and no, she likes Makeup but has infinite, she doesn't wear jewellery as such since she's a nurse doesn't have a reason to at work. Plays games, but don't wanna just buy her a game and some flowers that feels a bit lame
Can be flexible, tell her you're taking her to a comedy club (or something else that's easy to just do whenever) and she can pick the time/day to work around her schedule
Yeah we've done that before too, either buy a giftcard or just get a normal card and give that with the 'promise' of going somewhere? For my bf's birthday I took him to a spa and dinner but he got to choose the date because he's usually busy with work. When he picked the date I made reservations and all was set :)
I'm a pc gamer so I just haven't really put much thought into it but with games like red dead I do feel a little envious :p But buying a console you only like 1-2 games on is a bit pointless
Really though, If my bf would f'ing finally sit down and play a boardgame with me, or better yet visit the board game cafe for christmas, I'd be so happy.
trick is to spring them separately, just when she's WOW! at the pendant, you pull out the matching ring, then as an afterthought the earrings.... but the most important bit is to do it where her friends can see.... makes a big difference
Talking about cars and SO's, I just asked my bf how the appointment with a new contractor for our front door went this moring. His answer: 'Yeah he owns 4 alpha's he likes to work on and he really liked my car so that was cool'.
Apparently we now judge contrators by their love of cars.
idk for me it very much depends on the venue and ofc the artist. But I wouldn't go see someone I love in a very large venue, I can just turn on the tv and watch a recording at that point.
I have re-discovered Evernote and instantly remembered why I shouldn't use this. I have spent the last hour organising and noting shit while I should be working.
I say this as my nights and days merge, I lose track of what day of the week it is. IT's over for me, I have developed an addiction I have yet to even start playing
@motosubatsu yeah, his posts were.... interesting. I must say, he was brave to post that. And by that, I mean "brave" in the precise way that a British MP says it about another British MP
1/ This post is critical of us, but it’s worth reading anyway. The empathy, introspection, and open-mindedness the author shows here is also what makes him a great moderator. https://medium.com/@HDE226868/the-things-that-hurt-ce5a893abb53
SE can only disrespect the people who volunteer to make them money so long before those people get pissed off enough to quit. First in small amounts, but you can see from the massive negative response nearly anything SE puts on meta that it's not "small" numbers of people irritated at them
I think expecting an official recanting & deletion of the tweets is off the table, as is reversing the rash decision, as is incorporating more meta feedback into things
Be polite, and your ignored. Be polite repeatedly, and you're "Sea lioning" Be forceful, and you're rude Be forceful with other people, and you're "Dog Piling" Continue to be forceful, and you're banned
I joined an all girl gamer discord and I basically just ran out of there. All they talk about it gender assuming, mansplaining and god knows what else.
It was important you make it clear what your gender is because you really don't want anyone assuming you to be a gender you're not. Yet all genders should be equal.
@RichardU It actually does have legitimate uses. If you're debating about the ins and outs of policy regarding the female reproductive system, being a man colors your view on those matters and mansplaining is used as a buzzword to convey that in a snappy way
Since I'm diabetic, hearing impaired, autistic, poor, and have been homeless, and a few other things I do not care to discuss, is my "lived experience" giving me more weight to my opinions?
I really don't get how anyone can make such a fuzz over calling you a 'him' when all they have to guesstimate that is a weird nickname and a generic avatar.
because "Your perspective colors your position in this debate and you ought to empathize with different perspectives instead of assuming everyone has your frame of reference" does not fit into 140 characters
@Summer a friend of mine and I were on a site, decades ago. All the time, she assumed I was a woman, and I had been assuming she was a man. Our tones disguised our gender.
@Magisch I feel like that's so hypocritical though? All these women want is equality and being understood by others, yet when a man tries to put himself in their shoes he's mansplaining?
@Summer no clue either, but I'm not a marginalized minority (at least not because of my gender) so I have really no firsthand experience to see why it might be grating
People posting on twitter overwhelmingly do not want to be argued with, challenged or disagreed with. They want to express themselves to a group of like minded individuals.
@motosubatsu I readily admit that I am not the most masculine of types, and most of my friends are women, so that has likely affected my speech patterns
I can see and understand the need for equality and understanding, even though it has never been an issue to me. But the whole hatred towards men, the mansplaining, throwing the sexism card everywhere.
I must admit I'm very tempted to blindly hate on very religious folks whenever I get out of a 2 hour conversation of them calling me an abomination unto the lord
idk I think religion is pretty magisch ;) for real though, the concept is very cool to me. I'm not religious myself but I can see why people are so drawn to it and I think it's very interesting to read about the origins.
@RichardU only if you also believe that a) you and said supreme being have the same definition of "misdeed" and b) that said supreme being gives a rodent's posterior about anything you do
I'm both surprised and a little disappointed nobody has created a religion that believes we live in a computer simulation. Like the flying spaghetti monster 2.0
@RichardU Want to go deeper? I have a theory that your reality and my reality are distict subsets of a reality R that share mostly a common base but sometimes our realities are actually different and some mental illness is the result of trying to resolve those difference
@Twyxz I have never worked less than 40 hours a week in my life. My dad never under 50 until he got laid off, then he kept himself busy in retirement by working.
@Magisch I think what I want most is for SE to double down on their company direction. Are they going to ignore the Q/A side of things and put that into maintenance mode? Just say it. They act that way but then say things that are different than that...
Milenials were told that they were special, that life was fair, and that people actually cared. Then, they get into the real world and BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
@ElysianFields think tim said at some point that all the QoL changes core users like had a "sponsor" ie a dev who liked the idea enough to do it on their own
@Magisch Thats because they are just treating a symptom not dealing with the root problem... because that problem is that the conflict is what attracts some people to interweb forums like SE.
@Magisch several years ago I realized that fundamentally, SE cannot care about Q/A since it's not making them more revenue.. adjusting my expectations in light of that was one of the most freeing things I have done with respect to SE
I might have more influence but I don't have enough fucks, as the phrase goes
I have instagram still, which I enjoy to keep track of friends/trends/fandoms etc but I'm also just not that into that either. I think that's mostly my personality though, I don't get very enthusiastic about anything lol
I keep going back to tech republic. They wanted more revenue, so they sold out all the oldtime hackers and contributers, now it's a wasteland earning next to no revenue.
SE is making the very same mistakes.
The code of conduct looks like it was written to scold petulant children.
@Magisch Long before EF took on the Mod Hat he was a very active user that helped the site succeed.
@RichardU Because the problem is we have a few petulant children, that refuse to play by the rules and intentionally go out of the way to cause havoc. Because this is the Interwebs
I cannot see someone seing the new policy and saying to themselves "Gee, I thought being a bigot WAS being nice, now I know that it is not, and to make up for my past deeds, I will run out and help someone in need"
The thing is I totally get that the SE network is SO (the company)'s trainset and they can have whatever rules they like within laws, I just find it so frustrating that they can't just come out and say plainly what their position is - all the recent contortions and BS just feels so.. childish
@IDrinkandIKnowThings yep, and be nice was a rule, a clear one. This is not a code of conduct, it's condescending scolding of the entire user base over the actions of the very few, thus demonstrating that they were beyond their depth.
@IDrinkandIKnowThings eh, I don't place myself above others. I figure if a back-asswards, socially awkward autistic such as myself can follow plain rules, so can anyone.
I think if they REALLY wanted to get serious, a simple $10 per year subscription fee would do the trick. That would keep the sock puppets down to a minimum, generate some revenue, and tighten the conduct because only people who WANTED to be here would be here.
But, as has been pointed out, the focus seems to be more on PR than solutions.
@RichardU the problem with the subscription model is that SE relies on the uneven levels of reciprocity - I doubt people like John Skeet would be interested in paying to share their knowledge
@RichardU but you'd need to pay for a while to get there.. you could implement a "free subscription month for each accepted answer" or similar but it would be trivial to circumvent.
monetizing Q&A is hard there's no doubt about it - so there SE has my sympathies, but given the answers are essentially one of the network's USPs pissing off the suppliers of those doesn't strike me as a smart long-term plan
@motosubatsu Monetizing will require giving up a fine level of control that the few at the top keep with the current model. Its not that they dont know how to make the money, its that they want to have their control, and make money.