Room for slhck and Diogo Rocha

slhck

19:27

Hey, can I quickly ask you what exactly you are editing? Are you going through a list of posts? It seems you're only embedding URLs all the time.

There's nothing wrong with plain URLs as long as there's nothing else to fix.

Diogo Rocha

Im not just embedding urls... most of my editions are because of this, but i'm reading each one of them and editing what it seems to help the topic reading..

slhck

@DiogoRocha Still, most of the time it's just the URL. Note that not all people appreciate that, e.g. superuser.com/posts/398542/revisions

I really appreciate what you're doing if you're embedding images too, and adding quotes, et cetera.

Diogo Rocha

I'm trying to do my best, I will considerate your observations from now

slhck

I only know that some users don't like it if the front page is full of questions without new information.

I personally don't care, but I thought I'd let you know @DiogoRocha

There were some discussions earlier on Meta.SU about mass-editing, and generally people didn't appreciate these kinds of edits.

A: Do we care about edit flooding? Should we be doing anything?

Edit floods are based really on the traffic of your site, and how much of an impact it will cause. For example, on Stack Overflow, you could probably do a flood of 150 edits in the span of an hour, and it'll have almost no impact - the front page moves fast enough to override even that much, and ...