@MatthewRead yeah, there's more than one issue here
there's release-signed vs. debug-signed, which I mentioned before reading the question
there's built with DEBUG=true vs. DEBUG=false, which is what Matthew's answer is mostly about
and there's debuggable=true vs. debuggable=false, which is what Izzy explicitly mentions in the question
you'd expect them to go together, but strictly they are three different things
@MatthewRead don't you find that that happens regardless of how the question is phrased?
@Izzy I don't think this is really an antifeature. An antifeature is something that's added deliberately but makes the app less useful to users. Leaving debuggable set is probably accidental and makes little to no difference to users.
@DanHulme I'd be really thankful if you could phrase an answer, Dan! Yes, I'm explicitly talking about the application-debuggable flag.
@DanHulme And now I'm getting confused: if it would make so little difference, why is it then the fdroidserver spits a warning on it? There must be more to it then "oh, just a variable set".
@beeshyams Don't be that hard at him: New user, first post. I've left a comment with a link to the corresponding help center page, and updated his answer accordingly. Considering this "spam" would be overdoing it a little (for a "first post" that is).
:) . I am confused by this electorate badge description- Vote on 600 questions and 25% or more of total votes are on questions- if i vote on 600 questions, 25 % doesn't make sense- obviously missing something
I saw that now because, system recommended to go in for that after getting the last badge
If it helps- I have voted 671 times with 387 on questions- so i guess what is meant is "Vote on 600 questions and answers and 25% or more of total votes are on questions- or the vote count includes comment votes?
You rejected the edit, but the user stated that the build was not bleeding-edge, so he corrected me. I would say that that does not deviate from the intent. I approved it, but I don't know if it's true yet. If someone does, please edit my question
@TheBro21 Factual corrections should be made in comments, and you can edit the answer if you investigate and agree. Directly editing something based on a contradicting opinion goes against the editing guidance:
Yeah, no worries -- you can say whatever you like about that firmware and you're free to accept such edits, as the author. But that shouldn't have been proposed as an edit and beeshyams was right to vote to reject it, as a reviewer
Stays like that. To me the numbers say "reached it". But it doesn't show in the list of badges "recently rewarded". Guess I'm too impatient, and the "little guy in the box doing all the SE calc" just has his coffee break #D