Long ago already. I dislike the new organisation as well, IMHO harder to follow and to reference. What still is working is the plain [FAQ]. But try following your own link here and see for yourself.
It ends up on the "about" page, which seems to be a catch-all-404 somehow :)
The "what shouldn't be asked" is no split on two pages: the one I've mentioned above (what is on-topic and what not), plus [help/dont-ask] (what kind of questions I should avoid). It would have more logic to group by "on-topic" and "off-topic" I guess :)
@Izzy Yeah, the list is split: there's one page of bad questions for the whole network (opinion-based, too broad, etc.), and then the on-topic page is site-specific so all the site-specific off-topic reasons are in there.
often sites start out accepting them, but they get fed up of list questions and "which is the best" soon enough
bicycles.SE has a lot of product recommendation questions, and they try to be forgiving if they start out opinion-based, but there are a few people who give good, balanced answers even to the opinion-based questions
but that site has a sizeable community of people who know what they're talking about, and not so many questions
it's the other way around for us: lots of questions, and fewer regular answerers