« first day (1795 days earlier)      last day (1739 days later) » 

02:32
Word of the morning: bradyphrenia
 
1 hour later…
03:33
Is this so?
> When I was a kid, my parents were very young and could only afford a second-hand Texas Instruments calculator which was missing the 'X' button. Times were hard.
@CowperKettle sounds like horse crap
It's not even a relative clause. It's a separate sentence
I would normally use "this is why" at the beginning of a sentence.
It's not a conjunction.
> When I was a kid, my parents were very young and could only afford a second-hand Texas Instruments calculator which was missing the 'X' button. Times were hard.
This is very funny.
04:49
We use X to denote multiplication. And also times. As in 3 x 4 = 12. Or three times four equals twelve.
 
7 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
12:45
@M.A.R. Hm, I don't know... Normally I'd vote BS, but I sensed a difference in the direction they're describing (without having read the description first). It's probably some kind of... not-very-widely-applicable rule.
I think I'm just "sensing" the usual this vs. that thing, though.
Like, the usual reply to a Why do... blah blah? question is Blah blah, that's why., not Blah blah, this is why.
I can imagine either word used in the original sentences, but the emphasis changes slightly, at least for me.
 
3 hours later…
 
2 hours later…
17:41
> - An over there is where we will have sex.
- We?
 
6 hours later…
23:46
@CowperKettle Ooch!

« first day (1795 days earlier)      last day (1739 days later) »