Would 'A Tale of two Cambridges' be correct english? Here Cambridge would refer to the two cities named Cambridge, one in the UK and one in the US

@kauray I think it’s fine.

@ColleenV So no apostrophe needed after s?

What would I call an object that is identifiable with a name? To better explain what I mean, a tempting answer of mine would be: nameifiable

@kauray No, there’s no possessive aspect to it - it’s just plural

@MuhamedCicak I don’t understand what you mean by “identifiable with a name”

Something that can be named? What’s an example of such an object

@ColleenV Yes exactly. Anything that can be named.

@ColleenV Well its an example of my C++ abstract class that gives an ability to other derived classes to be able to be named. But also as a real world example, there are "things" that are not identified by names. Like a memory block in a computer is a number, and not identifiable with a name. Im sure there are other things IRL that are identifiable with an ID but not a name (as there is bunch of them or for whatever reason).

I'm sorry if my explanation is inadequate

oh, I thought of "nameable" just now and googled it, seems like it is a thing :)

Isn't it the opposite of 'anonymous' what you are looking for?

'named' and a host of other words would be the antonym of anonymous

@MuhamedCicak “Nameable” would be the most likely candidate off the top of my head. There might be some other words that would work based on the reason for giving these objects a name instead of just an identifying number.