@ColleenV definitely it has. I will try it on my own for some days. If I am still unable to come to any good conclusion. I will ask it on the main site.
The most recent installments of James Bond (ones featuring Daniel Craig) have fewer gadgets but more raw action (like the chase sequences in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace). Is it because of plot related changes to the MI:6 or have the movies been altered to suit the audiences?
'Cept, like, that's not the intended use of lists. That's a violation of the • List • Code.
(Edgy.)
By the way, is it just me, or is your user handle not shown in my previous message? Is that expected behavior? (I can't see the arrow at all – I fiddled with CSS and such at some point and now I don't see any controls, so that might be affected as well.)
I'll go and test in the Sandbox.
OK, so it's the newline that trips it up.
a b
> In particular the invisible car was just laughed at when I saw it theatrically, as was the huge laser that could destroy land targets but seemed to only warm up the plane gradually, plus the ice-hotel, the VR headset and a number of other items that not only didn't add anything but actually made the film laughable.
The invisible car was the pinnacle of the entire movie.
The most recent installments of James Bond (ones featuring Daniel Craig) have fewer gadgets but more raw action (like the chase sequences in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace). Is it because of plot related changes to the MI:6 or have the movies been altered to suit the audiences?
Language Overflow
Language Overflow