« first day (1112 days earlier)      last day (2424 days later) » 

00:30
@snailboat ell.stackexchange.com/q/171314/3395 I don't remember exactly but we talked about this, at least in context of plural genitives, I think, where a plain-case plural replaces the genitive? I.e., that's the tendency nowadays?
Hope y'all're doing fine. (:
Anonymous
01:29
11
A: Shouldn't "five minute walk" be "five minutes walk" in this sentence?

snailboatWhen a modifier comes directly before a noun, we say that it's in attributive position: Attributive noun: a chicken pie Attributive adjective: a tasty pie When a noun is used attributively, you typically put it in the singular: a chicken pie *a chickens pie  (non-standard) This tende...

Anonymous
Quirk et al is now somewhat out-of-date and I believe attributive plurals are more common today than they were even in the 80s, but I don't have any numbers for you.
07:19
Snail and Colleen already added cool questions
@Snail should I add a "lack of research close reason" question to the questionnaire?
Anonymous
08:09
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ You could, although it actually sounds more like something you'd want to write a meta post about.
09:26
@snailboat I think I have
Shrug
09:50
@snailboat What a forty years' period makes to a nice grammar book!
 
2 hours later…
11:28
@snailboat Thank you.
@CowperKettle Well CoGEL does present a synchronic overview of English grammar, I believe.
12:13
#3 is boils down to this: SE doesn’t have a mechanism for easily notifying individual users. — J.R. ♦ 10 hours ago
Yeah, the technology just isn't there yet, unfortunately.
What a bunch of nonsense.
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
13:35
I haven't head so-so since the adoption of meh. — Mazura Jun 30 at 18:27
Anonymous
Do you suppose these things are related? So-so and meh seem quite different to me.
Anonymous
I was surprised to see people comparing them.
Indeed.
I'm just reading through these answers...
Anonymous
This is just my own personal intuition, but I don't feel I can generally substitute one for the other without something being off.
Anonymous
"You want to get something to eat?" "Meh/*So-so. Not really."
13:37
They're not the same. So-so is more positive, or more neutral.
Haha, well, the example you list is obviously the way it is because meh is an exclamation or such.
Anonymous
Meh is markedly informal, and so-so isn't especially.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Yeah, but that's a real difference. I mostly use meh in situations where so-so would be inappropriate.
Anonymous
I mean, where it wouldn't make sense.
Anonymous
So-so isn't especially formal, but it's not restricted to informal speech like meh.
13:40
I think maybe there's a trend towards exaggeration. One example could be literally? I might be mistaken, though.
Maybe that's just me.
Anonymous
Literally is walking the same road as literal, very, verily, truly, real, really, serious, seriously, legit(imate), legitimately, and so on.
Someone from South Africa answered; I like that.
Hm, yeah.
But anyway, I agree that so-so and meh are different.
We have the equivalent of so-so in Croatian, and to me it sounds very cute, but it's also not really used.
Anonymous
No one objects when we say really to mean 'very' or very to mean 'really', even if we don't mean those words in their literal meanings. There's something about literal that bugs people, though, and I'm not sure if it's just memetic peeving, recency, or some expectation that the word be autological.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 What is it?
It's tak'-tak' (more informal) or tako-tako (more positive).
Here it's also commonly used to describe relationships They're [with each other] so-so.
Anonymous
13:48
In Japanese, mā mā.
Hah.
By the way, the accepted answer reiterates the tale about How are you? but more often than not I find the story not necessarily true as my pen pals will actually tell me what's going on in their lives when I ask them that.
Anonymous
How are you? is a really versatile expression.
They'll tell me exactly how they're feeling to the point where I remember and contemplate the above story.
Anonymous
It can be entirely phatic. If I'm at the grocery store, and a teller asks me "How are you?", and I start to tell them my life story, they might engage me in conversation, but they might also be a bit dismayed I answered seriously.
Anonymous
But if I say it earnestly to an old friend I haven't spoken to in years, they'll probably assume I want a serious answer. Of course, they still have the option of interacting more superficially if they want to for some reason.
Anonymous
13:54
If you were just in an accident, and someone asks you How are you?, it's almost certainly a heartfelt invitation for a genuine response.
Anonymous
I think it all just depends on context. The listener has to read the situation and decide if the first speaker wants a genuine response, and then they have to decide whether they want to give a genuine response.
Anonymous
I think since we're so practiced in using it as a phatic expression, giving less genuine responses to it comes fairly easily to most people.
Anonymous
I know some people are a bit off-put by the question and don't really know how to respond, though. There are all kinds of people in the world, and some people don't do well with that sort of interaction.
Anonymous
As you might have surmised, I'm the sort who talks too much when given the opportunity :-) I'm very chatty.
13:57
Haha.
Anonymous
Very good explanation. I'd also say that I've never actually actively heard someone say the word (phrase? vocalisation?) 'meh' as part of a sentence (and I'm part of the generation that started using it!). The only use I've actually come across is as a standalone response which I read to be one of the 'not so good' responses. So "Hey, how are you?" -> "Meh", which would read to me as an invitation to ask what's wrong similar to responding with "Not so great". — Ynneadwraith Jul 2 at 13:50
Anonymous
What generation is that, I wonder? People who were alive in 1994 and later?
But you're right, it really depends on the context. If one of my peers asks me What's up? they don't really expect me to answer earnestly, unless we haven't seen each other recently, then that's asking about my studies and stuff like that.
Anonymous
If I had to guess, I'd think that meh is probably most common in people ages 50 and younger.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 You can tell a lot by the tone of voice, I feel.
14:01
My neighbor, however, who sees me every day, asks just What's up? but expects me to stop and tell him everything that's happened to me recently and what I'm gonna be doing next week. He's old and a bit lonely.
Anonymous
My neighbors are Japanese and don't have a lot of other people to talk to, I think.
Anonymous
I don't think they ever really got comfortable with English, despite living here for decades.
Yeah, but that sounds like a great opportunity for you to practice your Japanese.
Anonymous
Oh, sure. I use Japanese every day.
Anonymous
Of course, I also use English every day. I live in the United States. This isn't exactly an immersion environment for me.
Anonymous
14:09
Japanese learners are very competitive and orthodox. They spend a lot of time talking about things like learning methods and who's doing what wrong. I'm happy, though, since I understand people and can express myself fine in Japanese and I can read novels and ling papers, which is about what I need to do :-)
Anonymous
Personally, I spend more time talking with people about learning English than about learning Japanese.
I'm grateful for that, haha.
Anonymous
English is such an interesting language.
Anyway, the ODE says about meh: "1990s: apparently popularized by the US television show The Simpsons."
Anonymous
Yes.
14:12
So... it'd be the generation that watched The Simpsons.
Anonymous
The Simpsons has been pretty influential linguistically.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Well, that's pretty much everyone :-)
Anonymous
It was a really popular show for a long time, and I think people of all ages watched it.
@snailboat Could you expand on that a little? All I can find are a dozen words, really.
Anonymous
Not just individual words. Snowclones like Worst. (fill-in-the-blank) Ever.
14:18
Hah.
That was interesting, thanks.
Hm...
Yes. It's so good, users are deliberately not upvoting it. Instead, they are upvoting the other questions so as to pretend they agree with them. It's a ruse, a ploy, counter psychology… whatever. But I'm not falling for it. Winning! :P — Mari-Lou A 2 hours ago
Counter psychology?
Anonymous
Presumably reverse psychology.
Anonymous
I haven't heard the counter version before.
14:34
It's just odd hearing it from a native speaker of English.
Anonymous
Mari-Lou is not a native speaker of English. (Edit: see userr's message below for correction)
Anonymous
At least, she said she wasn't before.
Anonymous
But if she's not, she has very native-like English.
Anonymous
It's possible I've misremembered or misunderstood.
I think her first language is English but, as she herself says, she's been living in Italy for far too long.
Anonymous
14:42
Maybe so. Well, I don't have a strong interest in keeping track of who is and isn't a native speaker, but I suppose you could ask her if you're interested to know.
Anonymous
Sometimes people don't like it when you ask them, but I sometimes do randomly ask people just that so I know whether to put their sentences down as citations or not.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Even native speakers can make word substitution errors.
Right, and the whatever part Mari-Lou included (although perhaps not because she wasn't sure whether it's counter psychology) is idiomatic in those circumstances.
ell.stackexchange.com/q/7180/3395 confirms what I said above.
Anonymous
Thanks, I see.
Anonymous
I do run into people not too infrequently who say they aren't sure whether they should count themselves as native speakers of a language. I guess it's not always really clear.
14:53
Well, maybe they've started forgetting it, but I think once they get back into an environment where their native language is spoken it shouldn't be too difficult to regain the native-like level they spoke at previously.
Maybe a couple of years and you're as good as new.
Anonymous
I edited my message above to include strikethrough. I don't want to misrepresent people.
Haha. (:
Anonymous
I'm heading out in a few minutes. I'm troubled at the moment because the rat(s) that invaded the house seem to have bled on my floor.
Anonymous
That's not good for the rats, and it's not especially good for me either.
Oh goodness me.
Anonymous
14:58
I'm calling someone today to take care of them and rat-proof the house. I found someone local who handles wild rats humanely.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Look at this cute little guy. Picture taken minutes before he managed to escape the trap.
He's even cute.
Anonymous
That was about a week ago.
Beady-eyed, dirty little thing.
Anonymous
15:00
I'm not sure if it was just a bad trap, or if it was the wrong trap to catch rats, or what. It was supposed to be a live trap that doesn't hurt them. (The snap traps are safer for humans and more reliable, I think, than live trapping.)
Anonymous
I can't tell you how startled I was when the rat managed to smack the door to the trap open and bolt out past my feet.
Hahah, wow.
I had a mouse once climb the drape (very quickly) inches from my face at around 2 a.m. as I was on my PC.
I didn't sleep in that room for the next two days until I cleaned it completely and removed the intruder. We use glue for mice, but rats are a bit more tricky (we haven't really had them).
Once I saw my neighbor's dog carrying a huge rat in his mouth with blood dripping from his jaw (sorry). It was as big as a cat.
@snailboat Oh, by the way, I remember Cowper mentioning the place you live. Ironic, huh? (:
Anonymous
15:30
Rat's Corner.
Anonymous
The poor thing cut itself on one of the larger knives in my kitchen, which was big enough that it doesn't fit entirely into the drying rack, so part of the blade was exposed.

« first day (1112 days earlier)      last day (2424 days later) »