I was looking for a duplicate of a recent question regarding tense shifting, and then I remembered I answered a similar question a while ago. But then I found this comment:
The statement that 5th century people believed the world to be flat is still valid today. Of course we know the world isn't flat, but the report of their belief still holds today; nothing has changed. So you can retain the present tense or optionally backshift it to the preterite. (simple past tense). But it is optional, not obligatory. — BillJDec 25 '16 at 9:48
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Trying to understand the intention of your "not" - do you mean that they didn't take you seriously, or that they did? Natural parsing is that they did, with the hint of an implication that you didn't like it.
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Vandalism is one of those things tends to be a percentage play. You might be able to cut it down, but addressing root causes is tough. The methods might not relate directly to the effect - e.g. fixing broken windows: that makes more targets right? Yet it's said to reduce crime. So ... gum control might not be such a bad idea after all.
Can you please clarify whether the phonemic symbols /ɪ/ and /i/ can be used interchangeably to represent the sound at the end of such words as coffee, taxi, happy, easy, ready?
@Man_From_India the parents' faith is a deep lake, and its water has an undisturbed, smooth surface
Now what that means, how the hell should I know?
1 hour later…
Anonymous
18:47
Sometimes it's frustrating talking about language because so much of our teaching is stuck in the past. People still learn the old definitions for a lot of stuff even when we know they're incorrect . . .
Anonymous
And that makes it harder for learners, because they hear multiple definitions, some of which lead them to the wrong conclusions.
Anonymous
Of course, they're all stated authoritatively, because we're on the internet.