« first day (94 days earlier)      last day (404 days later) » 

Anonymous
00:59
@Catija White people, too! :-)
Anonymous
I'm embarrassingly pale.
01:20
@snailboat You'd be very popular over here. :-)
Skin whitening creams and lotions are ever best selling items.
01:51
@snailboat So true. My Italian heritage gives me "olive" skin that tans easily and rarely burns... but some people are so white they glow in the dark... and I have a friend who's so pale he's pink.
 
7 hours later…
08:38
hola
@in how was ur weekend?
Fun. How else is it supposed to be?
not fun. just like mine
08:44
I had small accident. So my hands are now too slow to do all the stuff :(
Car accident?
friend's mo-pad accident.
doctor told it will take a week to recover because hard skin of my palm is pilled of
08:51
BTW need to go. Bye
09:04
@Freddy Sorry to hear that! Get well soon.
 
3 hours later…
user116848
12:14
@Freddy Aww I am sorry to hear that. Get well soon!
user116848
13:52
Just came across this term somewhere thought I'd share: ad nauseam
user116848
> referring to something that has been done or repeated so often that it has become annoying or tiresome.
user116848
> "the inherent risks of nuclear power have been debated ad nauseam"
14:35
@Arrowfar I have seen it before. . .only in ELU's meta.
Anonymous
14:51
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M I think you'll probably run into it from time to time in semi-formal contexts.
Yeah, the ad somethingeums are very widely used in those. Or were.
The most common one is probably ad infinitum.
If it's only ad, I'd say the commonest is ad hoc.
Oh, yes--that, too!
I ran into it so often back then. Perhaps it still was the time that many things in programming had to be done ad hoc-ish.
Anonymous
ad hominem is common on internet forums
Anonymous
14:58
ad libitum is common in nutrition papers
Anonymous
ad lib is common, um, lotsa places. :-)
Yeah, I was thinking of ad hominem.
Also ad vertisement.
Anonymous
Silly :-)
Oh @snail silliness has a world of its own.
ad ridiculus :P
15:03
No, that should be ad ridiculum. It's always in that format because: 1) it must sound like an element. 2) it's chic.
@snailboat I wonder... your Username is blue in chat but everyone else's is black... is that a mod thing or am I missing something more obvious.
Anonymous
Mod thing
Anonymous
And room owners are in italics.
Ah, So... if a room owner is a mod, are they both or does the mod thing supersede the room ownership?
Anonymous
Mods can do whatever room owners can do in any room.
15:06
And that's not fair. </rant>
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Well, I'm not either, so rant all you like. :P
@Catija No, I'm an RO, but ROs have less controls over their own rooms than mods from the other side of SE ocean do.
And that's basically unfair IMO.
One flaw IMHO about the design of RO is that ROs can't edit or delete messages.
I don't think that's a flaw... if someone creates a room and decides they want to edit what another user appears to have said, that's not OK.
But it's okay with mods?
15:13
@Catija The other user can just ignore the someone's room.
It's their room anyway.
I think that the mods are expected to show a bit more discretion.
There's a difference between ignoring someone and changing their chat message to read something inflammatory or racist/sexist...
or undoing racist/sexist and other kinds of discrimination messages.
Well, if an RO is a jerk, the victim could simply not enter that room and talk @Cat.
Editing is not as important as deleting (or moving messages to trash) IMHO.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M This room, at least, is an "official/semi-official" site room... though... it's not really their room...
15:16
You're simply saying I don't think we should allow people do stuff because they may misuse them. This logic is proven to be infallible.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M That's the way the entire SE site works, not just the chats. There's a reason you need 2K to freely edit posts without review.
@Catija The main rooms are a bit different, yeah, but that's why we have chat mods; additionally, I haven't seen any jerks capable of being an RO for the main room or at least a popular room on a site.
Akh, in the second to last message I should've posted fallible.
@Catija That's because people may not know how to edit constructively.
But an RO knows their chat; they're that room's owner!
The bottom line is, we make use of what we have. :-)
The best we can.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Yes... and? You only need 100 rep to create a room... Why would you expect a 100 rep user to know what's acceptable behavior?
100 rep is at least 10 upcoats.
@DamkerngT. BTW I told someone in chat to kick me outta the room to see what happens.
But since I didn't feel any pain in the A when kicked out it wasn't fun. :(
15:22
I could be useful to visualize how it works when you have to use it.
It would.
Bottom line, @Cat I do not buy the fact that a for example, ask patents mod knows the culture in chem more than user in the site with 100 rep.
One way to test the character of a person is to give them the power.
Another is to put them into suffering.
Now which one should I do?
Neither. :-)
Then propose a secondary way to create or elevate more chat mods... but I don't think that every RO should have that total control by default. Honestly, if snailboat hadn't helped me out by giving someone a timeout a few months ago, a bad interaction could have gotten worse but you're implying that she shouldn't have been able to do what she did because she's not a mod on ELL.
@DamkerngT. Which requires the added mod power of removing the RO powers, which isn't an issue right now.
15:29
No, I'm not saying a mod should have less control, I'm saying an RO should have equal control to a mod.
Or at least, almost equal.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Um... not even close. I do not want to get put on a chat ban simply because some idiot RO doesn't like what I said in their chat.
user116848
Oi!
The design seems to be based on, among others, one idea which is not always true: a RO is always in the room.
Being an RO has so little benefits, @Dam was baffled a while ago about what he can do that someone with a nonitalic name can.
user116848
I mean hi guys.
I don't come here to argue about this crap. I'm here to chat with people. We clearly disagree and I don't honestly have a horse in the race, so I don't really care that much.
Are we exercising or something?
@Catija chat bans are caused by either several flags from different users or a mod doing so, but allowing ROs to expand their kick-mute is a good idea, you must admit.
user116848
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Did something happen?
15:32
@Catija :( Why leave? Bah, maybe @Cat wasn't in a mood for discussion.
@Arrowfar Nah.
user116848
Okay good, good.
user116848
I thought you guys needed Arrow's help.
I was saying an RO should have more control over their own room than they now do.
user116848
<looks around for laughter>
Bah, I'm already happy, let me go to those Indians' chatroom to sadden a bit.
user116848
15:35
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M It is just a SE. Who cares about control? Pfft. I just come here and have fun with you guys.
Control is fun.
user116848
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M I can sadden you. What do you want to hear?
You should be an RO somewhere to see what I mean.
user116848
Well you can put me in the list here O.O
user116848
Your call.
user116848
15:36
I am good anyways.
user116848
I'd just change the room topic and that's about it I guess.
user116848
And I came across this:
user116848
In literary criticism, stream of consciousness is a narrative mode, or device, that seeks "to depict the multitudinous thoughts and feelings which pass through the mind. Another term for it is 'interior monologue'." The term was coined by William James in 1890 in his The Principles of Psychology, and in 1918 May Sinclair first applied the term stream of consciousness, in a literary context, when discussing Dorothy Richardson's novels. == Definition == Stream of consciousness is a narrative device that attempts to give the written equivalent of the character's thought processes, either in a loose...
user116848
Oh do you guys watch Arrow?
user116848
You might know this second person:
15:41
What is that? Is it edible?
user116848
user116848
First one is the promo shot from next year's Supergirl.
user116848
Did I change multiple topics just now?
Like one superdude wasn't enough. There must be a supergal too.
user116848
15:42
Because some people in my real life complain that I change topics a lot.
user116848
Whatever that means.
user116848
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Hee!
user116848
You got a point there bro.
Well, I'm not really chatting/talking, so I don't know if you change stuff.
user116848
So you are multi tasking right now?
15:44
uber multi tasking.
user116848
In a car? I see.
user116848
15:58
Ahh "uber" the word.
user116848
> denoting an outstanding or supreme example of a particular kind of person or thing.
"she's a self-proclaimed uberbitch"
Of all the example sentences in the world, was that the only one you found?!
user116848
Naah swearing in jokes, sentences etc. is fine unless it is directed at someone.
I know, but!
user116848
I searched Google and I found that example on the top, maybe that's why.
user116848
16:11
You see I come from ELU chat so I can't help it O.O
user116848
ELU ways rubbing off on me.
user116848
I came here to enjoy and no one is here?
user116848
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M So to ping MA now I have to write "in...".
user116848
I was typing MA. It wasn't working. I thought "Wow, everyone left me, nooo!"
user116848
16:25
By the way are there any other good educational sites that have a good chat feature like SE? I searched but to no avail. Let me know if there are any.
user116848
Let's see there is "Wordreference", "Englishforums" and... I don't know they are not very interactive.
I dunno, frankly speaking.
17:06
Hello, @Chad!
o/ @Chad!
Welcome to our chatroom!

« first day (94 days earlier)      last day (404 days later) »