Good to see that.

@b3m2a1 Well, I also have to go. In Germany, it's already past 2 a.m.. Good night!

Goodnight

@b3m2a1 By rewriting the problem to more compact form, for instance. :) It's just quite easy to write problems in ways that turn out to have horribly larger search space than necessary...

I really like AllTrue and its cousins like AnyTrue, but now I might have to work with Mathematica 9. Is there an efficient (I don't need it to cover all use cases) way to remake them in Wolfram Language? Or would I need a C program? (Just let me know if this is big enough I should ask it as a proper question.)

@KubaThat 108 video seems interesting. Can't watch it in full now but I saw a snippet and John Fultz (I think that's the voice) appears to be on it and potentially talking about some undocumented FE autocomplete stuff

@b3m2a1 Yep, it was really interesting.

@halirutan Were there any particular highlights?

@b3m2a1 Yes, they mentioned to document how to add highlighting and autocompletion to your own stuff :) Things we know since ages.

@halirutan Ahh. Interesting but disappointing there's nothing deeper. Not terribly surprised though as these tend to be very high-level/surface level discussions.

@b3m2a1 Basically the main point was to unify how and in which way to collect the information that are autocompleted.

@halirutan A+

I'm glad someone was there to point this out to them

@b3m2a1 Yep, it's so weird that we seem to live on two sides. WRI is really not having a clue what we actually do with Mathematica.

It is wild...

Although I'd hazard actual WRI employees are much more queued in

I hope they don't introduce a bunch of breaking changes on this... :|

@b3m2a1 Oh Steven's suggestions had a lot potential of breaking something existing :)

And the proposals for the paclet system could be brutal...