12:17
NotebookWrite[CreateNotebook[], { Cell["foobar", CellID -> 0], Cell["foobar", CellID -> 1000000], Cell["foobar", CellID -> 1000000000], Cell["foobar", CellID -> 1000000000000] }, All]
Looking at the resulting notebooks CellIDs (press CTRL+SHIFT+E on windows), it seems like 0 is completely broken, and anything bigger than ~10^9-10^12 (didn't do more tests) is invalid
Also, are CellID guaranteed to be unique when left unspecified, even when some Cells in the same Notebook have a custom CellID? The documentation says "When CellID is managed by the Wolfram System, its value is guaranteed to be unique in a given notebook. It is possible for a CellID to be set by hand, but its uniqueness will no longer be guaranteed.". I read this as "If you don't specify anything for a Cell, the automatic value for that Cell will not collide with anything" - is this correct?
3 hours later…
15:21
17:06
posted on June 26, 2018 by Brian Wood
In the past few decades, the process of redistricting has moved squarely into the computational realm, and with it the political practice of gerrymandering. But how can one solve the problem of equal representation mathematically? And what can be done to test the fairness of districts? In this post I’ll take a deeper dive with [...]
3 hours later…
20:02
221
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd9d/5cd9d95280ccf1bf8c113139263767d2f3abc15d" alt="Meta Stack Exchange"
In order to increase the efficiency with which poor quality questions are closed, it could make sense to have weighted close votes for a small subset of qualified users.
A very good way to measure the qualified users would be to leverage the tag badges. However, it needs to be rationally limite...
« first day (2351 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (2434 days later) »