I'm astonished that there are people who think 12D integrals should finish in a reasonable amount of time.

@Edmund BlockchainData[BlockchainBase -> #] & /@ {"Wolfram", "Bitcoin", "Ethereum"} works well for me? or even just BlockchainData[]

Ah donk. I thought 20000 was when you got to see the site analytics.

Export["where", what]
Put[what .., "where"]
Write["where", what ..]
CDFDeploy["where", what]
CloudDeploy[what, "where"]

Is there a rule of thumb?

Don't forget DumpSave["where", what]

I figure it's whether things can be single argument or not.

Put can be single argument. CloudDeploy can be. But the rest need two.

@b3m2a1 yes though Put["where"] and CloudDeploy[what] :)

@Kuba yeah that's the flaw I noticed with that idea too

@b3m2a1 good rule to remember anyway. At least will make you check docs. Otoh I think I forget that Put can take single argument.

@b3m2a1 do you think it is possible to define your styles in a stylesheet in such a way that the menu label is different than the style name?

FE`Evaluate[FEPrivate`GetPopupList["MenuListStyles"]]

The structure suggests it could be so but I don't know how to affect this list from stylesheet level

Cool post form Jeff: " Simulating a Saturn Flyby in the Wolfram Language "

community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/1306910

@Kuba I don't think so. I assume that's the structure because that's how PopupMenuBox takes its choices. Look at ToBoxes@PopupMenu[Dynamic[a], Range[100]].

Also I'm always surprised what the Mathematica find interesting and what they pass over. I figured this post of mine would be a winner community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/1306464 but little interest while smaller, less interesting things I've writted up have garnered a much more enthusiastic response.

@b3m2a1 yes I know, so it could work, just there isn't a way to pass it

@b3m2a1 what is the flow when one has nice ref page with additional content but the function changes, e.g. by a new option? Do I need to merge manually?

@Kuba For docs where I actually write the content by hand I just save the templates and reuse them and add a new section for options and things. I think somewhere buried in the package there's a set of functionality to build a full template for a context which can be adjusted by hand. I was just changing BTools too much to be willing to invest in writing docs that could change in a month. I might resurrect that for some stand-alone packages with little expectation of change, though.

@Kuba Yeah not that I know of. There doesn't even seem to be a packet for setting these "MenuLists". All I have for "List" is {"CompletionsListPacket", "DebuggerSetStackList", "List", "OptionCompletionsListPacket", "OptionValuesCompletionsListPacket", "SetNotebookInList"}

@b3m2a1 ok, I will certainly give you feedback about docs tools because there is one project I would like to finish and document. But I don't have time :P

slash motivation

@Kuba writing a decent documentation page takes as long as writing 5 functions so I'm always happy to hear how I could improve my autogenerated stuff.