last day (15 days later) » 

7:56 PM
1
A: Range or Domain of Primitive Recursive Function?

Jing ZhangWLOG we might assume $A$ is not finite and $0\in A$. We take the definition of r.e. sets to be a set is r.e. if its characteristic function is partial recursive. Then A set is r.e. iff A is a domain of a strictly increasing partial recursive function. Proof: (only if) $A=\Phi_e$, define...

 
I want to approve, but please clarify your answer with specific part. for example (1) is true, because .... (2) is true because...
 
I've edited. There are parts in your question which are not clear, like (4)
 
I edited and remove typo in (4), please complete it about (4) to set bounty and approve.
 
Multiply everything by 2 produces a function whose range is a subset of even numbers
 
Please correct your answer to approve and set bounty, thanks.
 
7:56 PM
What is k in (4)?
 
I think k is a constant, I'm sure there is no meaning for Halting set, am I right
 
There is no meaning if k is a constant either, as in this case the set is either singleton or empty.
 
Which one can be suppose for k to this statement be true?
 
I have no idea. It's not true at t
At all that A must be a subset of even numbers. Or even the projection of A onto even numbers being r.e says nothing about A
 
we know A is r.e in the question.
 
7:56 PM
Then it would be equivalent to (1) (2) in the vacuous way.
 
$k \in \mathbb{N} $ ?
yeah, I'm sure it means some x from A that is even, now it's r.e?
 
Well it still does not make sense to me. The assertion that some x from A is even is r.e provided that A is r.e. But even when A is r.e this is not necessarily true. Like A=the set of odd numbers.
I'll suggest you look into the problems/definitions more carefully.
 
@JingZhang would you please continue here?
thanks.
okey I say if A be an arbitrary r.e
 
Hi I think I've made it pretty clear
 
we choose x that equals to 2k
it means choose x that is even.
so even number is an r.e set
?
 
8:01 PM
Even numbers is r.e
Recursive actually
 
so this statement be true. isn't it ?
 
Yeah if A is r.e
 
so please complete your answer. in the question I wrote A is r.e
complete your answer to approve.
 
Well (4) is a strict consequence of r.e
(1) (2) are equivalent to r.e
Under the assumption of r.e They are equivalent for trivial reasons
 
yeah please update and (3) is wrong.
please update your answer.
now bye until 15 min later.
 

last day (15 days later) »