check PSQ for closure

another PSQ for closure

please check for closure. The asker has no idea how to start.

this question has 3 close votes as of now. The source of problem is mentioned and probably the asker is not able to comprehend the statement mentioned in source. I think this can remain open.

PSQ for closure. The asker has no idea how to prove it.

PSQ for closure

close This PSQ has been around for weeks and now it got an answer.

I don't understand why the following was deleted:

math.stackexchange.com/q/4370572/104041

Please undelete it.

@Shaun It was automatically deleted by Roomba because it had a negative score an no answers.

Thank you, @XanderHenderson. Please would you help me undelete it?

Why? It was automatically deleted for lack of interest. I don't see any reason to use my diamond powers to unilaterally undelete it.

I think it is a good quality question, @XanderHenderson.

Yes, and? That doesn't address my comment.

It's undeleted now anyway :)

DV/Del PSQ & dupe of FAQ, noting novel

cv-pls real-analysis This is a duplicate of something, right? Proof for Cauchy's root test‭ - Orph‭ 2022-05-28 16:11:39Z

@XanderHenderson I would not be surprised if it was, but I searched for a duplicate and I was unable to find one. One thing is for sure: unlike what amWhy wrote, it is not a duplicate of this question; the question that is being discussed here is about superior limits, and the other one doesn't mention them at all.

DV/Del fatally flawed proof, which has confused at least one reader.

@BillDubuque It can be deleted now.