« first day (3559 days earlier)      last day (938 days later) » 

9:42 AM
Is this a bountied low-quality question? The remarks in the comments and answers prove that the question is non-trivial, but that doesn't make up for the lack of context?
 
 
2 hours later…
11:40 AM
I'm not sure if this is a good or bad question, but I think it may benifit from moving to a different SE site. (Sorry if this is outside of the wheelhose of CURED, but I don't know if there is a chat room for migrate sudgestions)
 
 
1 hour later…
12:55 PM
@user2628206 It is already a contextless question and should be closed
 
 
1 hour later…
2:05 PM
@TeresaLisbon Not enough context. The solution probably uses the recurrence relation correponding to the sequence.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:33 PM
@Peter Definitely, we'll let it hang around and close later, or we can flag immediately. What I've usually seen is that if the number (in this case 29 +\sqrt(21)) isn't a Pisot number (or a conjugate of one) then this kind of a question is best solved using a computer and/or finding modular patterns of very short period, which isn't the case as one answer evidences.
 
 
3 hours later…
6:25 PM
 
7:04 PM
D3.
 
7:54 PM
D2: I meant to link the question, not an answer.
 
8:31 PM
D1, D2, D3.
D4, D5, D6.
D7, D8, D9.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:16 PM
@user21820 D3 is fully open, no close votes.
 
10:30 PM
@user21820 Let us know if you meant to link a different question??
 
11:18 PM
@amWhy it was just reopened an hour ago. May be after user21820 posted the request.
 
@ArcticChar Thanks for the info. I should have checked the time-line!
 

« first day (3559 days earlier)      last day (938 days later) »