« first day (3054 days earlier)      last day (1440 days later) » 

12:20 AM
This duplicate and it’s solutions seem like useless duplicates: not sure when it is eligible for deletion tho math.stackexchange.com/q/3687336/29335
 
12:46 AM
It’s also a pretty egregious example of users with enough rep to know better gathering low-hanging-fruit
 
 
3 hours later…
3:49 AM
@rschwieb Agreed, I was the first delete vote. Both are common l.h.f. pickers (one is even named for such - per their own words iirc)
Ooops, was referring to another picker ^^^ in another recent question (but still true except for the name part).
 
4:49 AM
A duplicate in danger of being over-run by "needs details or clarity" votes: math.stackexchange.com/q/3662544/21412
(To be clear, I am requesting some help closing as the linked duplicate instead of the needs details or clarity reason.)
@rschwieb This user has been crossposting to MO within a couple hours of their posts here on MSE lately, which is an added annoyance :(
 
 
2 hours later…
6:38 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected (159): Boyles law question by hassan20 on math.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected (159): Alternate proof that $\exists\ x \in \Bbb{Z}$ such that $ \gcd (a+bx,x) = 1$? by hassan20 on math.SE
 
6:56 AM
@rschwieb I'm not sure of the algorithm, but I think score of −3 on the question can speed up deletion availability for closed questions, such as happened with that one. Unrelated, I personally let closed questions stay around for the system-inbuilt 2/3 days before voting to delete, unless it is a PSQ that already has answers.
@XanderHenderson Maybe we can ask @AlexanderGruber to help deal with such cases?
 
 
2 hours later…
9:03 AM
I sure can when I'm around.
 
@AlexanderGruber Great! So can you close it? It only needs 1 more close-vote anyway.
 
9:21 AM
@user21820 Oh that makes sense, I'd been looking at the wrong link (which was already closed). Done
I'm pleasantly surprised to see the review queue is going down, in other news. Wasn't expecting that.
 
@AlexanderGruber That's interesting. Maybe more people are getting interested in helping reviewing.
 
I really hope so. It's looking like most American schools are down for the count through Fall semester, so there will probably be another big wave in a couple months here.
2
 
Oh maybe that is the real reason.
Less homework ⇒ less cheating. Lol.
 
Yeah I definitely think that's what's been happening. It's one of the reasons I'm working on that script.
 
Ah I see.
 
9:32 AM
It may or may not be helpful for screening questions (I hope it will be) but a peripheral benefit would be the ability to actually measure PSQ volume non-subjectively
 
9:55 AM
I see that this was undeleted: Finding value of $\alpha+\beta+\alpha\beta$ where $\alpha$, $\beta$ are roots of a quadratic equation with coefficients in arithmetic progression. I guess it makes sense to reopen it and close as a duplicate. (I have cast one reopen vote with this in mind myself.)
I guess that even if some users might disagree with the closure as missing context, nobody will argue against closure as a duplicate.
 
 
5 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
3:41 PM
D1, D2, D3.
D4, D5, D6.
D7, D8, D9.
C1, C2, C3.
C4, C5, C6.
C7, C8, C9.
This is problem 9 on the PROMYS Europe 2020 Application Problem Set, maths.ox.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/… – you cheating lowlife. — Gerry Myerson Mar 3 at 4:55
Cheating during coronavirus pandemic. Tsk tsk.
 
4:07 PM
@user21820 I don't think that C7 is a very great question (the answer is, essentially, learn basic algebraic manipulation), but I am hesitant to vote-to-close for lack of context or clarity. It is kind of a dumb question, but I don't see anything obviously off-topic about it. It has also survived several rounds in the close queue, where at least 10 unique users voted to "leave open". On the other hand, with one more downvote, it will get Roomba'd soon.
Sorry... not C7. C8.
Grumble... I've changed my mind.
I’m voting to close this question because the answer is, essentially, "bone up on your basic algebraic manipulation". There seems to be a complete answer in the comments, and the asker appears to be satisfied. I don't see this question having any lasting value for Math SE, hence I think that closure and deletion is an appropriate course of action. — Xander Henderson 23 secs ago
 
4:25 PM
This is a duplicate many times over... I'm looking for a dupe target, but if someone else gets there first, help is appreciated. $i^2\neq1$, but what is the mistake I have made?‭ - ØNZQRC‭ 2020-05-23 16:23:41Z
 

« first day (3054 days earlier)      last day (1440 days later) »