@JoséCarlosSantos: Thank you. @amWhy: I kept my list short today -- D1, D2, D4 need only one more deletion vote. Thanks.

I posted some utter garbage and the OP accepted it. I'd like to delete it, of course. What's my play?

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Repeating characters in answer (82): Prove that every number has a unique representation in base 3. by lostone on math.SE

@Makyen Another alternative is to make the layout of [tag:...] configurable in URRS. Then there would definitely be no objection to using that variant. But in general the benefit of smooth automation outweighs the preference for meta-tags I would say. Definitely when we include Holo's concern about the visuals of meta-tag.

@MikeMiller Flag your answer, asking the moderators to delete it.

Nice bot! Everyone, this answer should be deleted.

@Lord_Farin Yes, having options in URRS to allow the tag background and text colors to be configurable was actually the first place I thought of when I mentioned that another script could changes the colors, but I was hedging the bet by implying that it could be in yet another script (undecided as to if it would be better in URRS, or broken out into it's own). :-)

In order to test, I'm looking for a question that's been closed with the "Blatantly off-topic" reason. I've looked through 50–100 closed questions. Ideally, it would be a question that's not deleted yet, so I could actually test. However, a screenshot of the question-closed banner (just below the OP's user-card) would be helpful if only deleted examples exist. I'm going to be afk for 5 or 6 hours. If nobody finds an example by the time I'm back, I'll just push the alpha CVRG with my best guess.

Thanks for keeping an eye out for an example question.

@Makyen Maybe I am looking in wrong places, but it seems that "Blatantly off-topic" reason does not exist on this site. (I am not sure when exactly this was changed.)

Seems to me that we can safely delete this

It seems that T Bongers' comment there was quickly proved incorrect.

@JyrkiLahtonen gone

Another silly answer that should be deleted.

PSQ duplicate of a question asked yesterday math.stackexchange.com/q/3086983/29335

@rschwieb Up for deletion.

Duplicate of this

close PSQ1, PSQ2

For deletion: D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8

For deletion: D9, D10, D11, D12

@RRL At least one from D1-D12, inclusive is now deleted; the others all need no more than one more delete vote.

close This, and this

close two psq's in one post, absolutely no context

close this, too.

@MartinSleziak Thanks. That's actually normal. I'm not sure where I got the belief that Mathematics was one of the sites that had "Blatantly off-topic" as an actual close reason, rather than just in the close-flag dialog.

I distinctly remember using "blatantly off topic". (For example, MathOverflow has such close reason.) But I do not exactly remember on which sites I have used it.