I think this can be reopened since the asker actually had attempted the question (see the comment under the deleted wrong answer) and found the equivalent statement but it wasn't among the given options.
@XanderHenderson I voted to close as too broad. It would be valid to close as "unclear what you are asking, because the OP never makes explicit what exactly they are seeking in an answer. But "too broad" seems to be the better close option, because if the question was to created a bit-list, it ought to me flagged for a moderator to make it a CW question, else there are too many possible good answers, each different from one another than any one answerer can likely answer in a page or so.
@XanderHenderson moot point, for now, as the asker has since deleted the question. But the OP might very well be crafting an edit to address the expressed concerns, with plans to reopen the question.
@RRL All of D1 through D6, inclusive, are now gone.
@amWhy @quid, @AlexanderGruber mostly serious proposal, though I am doubtful SE staff would want to resign the software wrt "close vote pop-ups", as suggested. This would require, as I envision, five votes to close/ one vote per person, but the reasons checked off by each user, together
with all the reasons checked off by the other four close voters, could be combined, with the reason(s) checked by most often by those users ranking highest as the reason for closure. This would be meaningful to me, e.g., in cases such as @Xander points to immediately before my "wish", but also when encountering a clear-cut duplicate question which is a bare-contextless PSQ, where both close as a dupe and close as off topic/lacing context apply
@XanderHenderson I agree, and voted to close as such. (Also qualifies in general as "off topic/not-about-math-as-defined..."), but I like the more specific reason better.
It's an interesting idea, but I do not consider the close reason as sufficiently relevant as to add that complexity @amWhy There is always the option of writing a comment or using an "other" close reason.
@quid Yes, I pretty much figured that it would require a greater degree of complexity in the dialogue re "reason for your vote to close."
@amWhy Please note, I am not claiming that there is absolutely no on-topic (for math.se) possible use of the advice tag; merely that I cannot think of one at this moment.
