SE can provide aggregated traffic data based upon geoIP location. Quantcast does similar

That'll give geography but not necessarily nationality

And I think I came up with a click bait worthy title, but still on-topic.

Yep. I tried not to be too click-baity with the title... :-)

Jus saw your answer - I like where that's headed

As an aside, you don't need to leave "Let me think ..." comments within the answer. They're okay as a comment to your own post; just clean them up when you come back.

And to help make your answer stronger, I don't mind running power to the unit, so it doesn't have to be self-supporting

I'm patient. :-)

If we're lucky, that question will hit the hot questions page for the network. That translates into more eyeballs and hopefully more votes for the existing answers.

And you've got me curious with the fitbit reference. Do those have a programming API available to them? That would be an interesting approach if so. Overall, that's a good start to what can turn into a really good answer since you're covering two (three?) different approaches.

Thanks! And yes, I had thought about that as well but was looking for "simple" first

@SamWeston If you're not at a point to where you can offer up a bounty, another trick on the non-trinity sites (SO, SU, SF) is to put a substantial edit in place. The edit improves the question and bumps it back to the front page so more eyes will be able to see it.

Site design - Webapps has an awesome 404 page. See webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/34/… for an example if you're not a 10k+ user there. Something for us to consider as well when we're coming up with site design ideas.

This room was placed in timeout for 1 minute; the topic of this room is "General discussion for engineering.stackexchange.com"; - conversation should be limited to that topic.

Testing the timeout feature.

@Air I'm sure I'll be accused of being biased, but that's a great one to tweet. :-)

it's progress! :-)

I don't know if the mod tools can tell us how "sticky" those questions are - ie. how much they get people to look at the rest of the site too

Yep

We need more clickbait worthy titles for good questions. :-)

emphasize the good questions part

There's an art to the clickbait title. It still needs to be relevant to the question, somewhat constructive, but also teasing enough to make something click through.

@Air I prefer "One weird trick..."

@TrevorArchibald Has motorola been keeping pace with the official android updates? One thing I dislike about some of the other android device vendors is the long lag between updates provided by google and them rolling it out on their devices

Ok. I'll stick with the nexus line then

Current phone contract comes up in a5 months or so. I need to re-evaluate where I want to get my next phone from. Happy with my current carrier but I may have reason to bundle and go with another one instead.

Yeah, I really dislike the forced data plan that I'm on as a result of the contract

I still haven't convinced myself that I need the Seek thermal camera yet. Just that I want it

Part of it is concern about coverage with the different carriers

VZW provides the best coverage in my neck of the woods, but I don't think they affordably support non-contract phones

I get annoyed at having to jump around like that

And yes, I'm willing to pay a bit more to not be annoyed. :-)

That I'm not sure about... :-)

Quite a bit cheaper than my monthly rate, but I'm still paying the phone off that way too

Not bad at all

@HDE226868 Could I talk you into putting some creative thought into editing this question so it would be suitable for migration? Space mods have said they'd like to see some sort of operational scale behind the question. Even though the OP didn't provide many details, anything to help tighten it up at this point would likely salvage the question.