@quid: Trollhunter's profile says "when I talk you should listen with the utmost respect, infact you should fear me". Isn't that abusive language?

@user21820: it is hard to believe that people can write such things about themselves. Perhaps keeping an air of mystery looks better than this.

@ParamanandSingh Yea. At the very least it should have used "in fact" rather than the non-word "infact", but of course that's a totally minor side issue. =P

Actually the reason I brought it up for moderator attention is that it seems to me to cross the line from just ridiculous to borderline threatening (as if other users should fear retaliation). Math SE history shows that threats by users on this site have actually been realized in real life.

I wouldn't care if it had been "you should be in awe of me" instead lol.

@user21820 I tend to ignore that

@quid I know that. But I don't think moderators should ignore that, for the reasons I explicitly spelt out above.

@quid So, let me understand you. Anything okay with you is okay, everything you don't like is not okay?? And I think you miss a valid point from @user21820:

Your answer "I tend to ignore that" is not quite clear. You ignore users who are retaliated mean spirited users who boldly threaten and/or rant about "certain users even moderators," including your tendency to ignore meta posts targeting specific user(s).

@amWhy I realize that, sorry. I wrote it in the middle of doing something else.

@quid No problem, we all have such moments ;D

I'll get back to that. See you;

@quid Just remember, all work and no play makes quid a dull boy ;P See you.

@user21820 @amWhy first the phrase was garbled, I meant to say something like I tend towards ignoring it. I have a hard time to see how it could be seen as an actual threat, but I'm not ideally placed. Maybe some native speaker like @AlexanderGruber or @XanderHenderson could weigh in.

@quid I am just as much of a native speaker as are @AlexanderGruber and @XanderHenderson.

@amWhy yes, but I assumed that you wanted moderator input. So I defer to some other moderators that might be better placed to evaluate it (and maybe more sensitive to this concern overall).

If you mean only a moderator who is a native speaker is trustworthy to weigh in, then say so.

@amWhy it's not a question of being trustworthy.

@quid The problem is, @quid, it's less important for us to have moderator input, then those of us who are more experienced than many of you, to seek our input, and contributions.

The question is that somebody would need to change it and it is better that somebody is convinced it is a good idea to do so.

@amWhy I don't care for the n-th iteration of this type of exchange.

@quid ?? If you want to dismiss me, than say so.

@amWhy you denigrated me. Don't change the narrative.

@quid No, I did not. You're over-reacting. All I ask is for a respectful reply to my most recent flag, and ping to you.