« first day (2758 days earlier)      last day (634 days later) » 

1:58 AM
ML Classification 0.023587541187245806 (Old classification 0.4)
Sorry, but StackOverflow is not somewhere where you can (basically) ask people to write software or develop websites for you. It is for actual programmers to ask questions about the tasks they are doing ... themselves. — Stephen C 36 secs ago
 
 
4 hours later…
5:33 AM
ML Classification 0.8379364718626461 (Old classification 0.0)
 
6:19 AM
ML Classification 0.008570469625864597 (Old classification 0.43)
If you are unable to make any attempt to program a solution, please hire a programmer. Stack Overflow is a community for programmers and programming enthusiasts. Please show more enthusiasm. — mickmackusa 57 secs ago
 
7:12 AM
Edits fetched for 278689: 5. quota remaining 9057
Edits fetched for 278689: 5. quota remaining 9052
 
7:37 AM
Edits fetched for 278702: 3. quota remaining 9027
Edits fetched for 139948: 4. quota remaining 9020
Edits fetched for 278702: 3. quota remaining 9017
 
8:10 AM
ML Classification 0.01687768625757427 (Old classification 0.59999996)
You can write a program to do it instead of doing it manually since they are all text-type files. After all, this site is for programmers. — Simon Mourier 54 secs ago
 
8:43 AM
ML Classification 5.538669638418442E-4 (Old classification 0.4)
This is also why using sites such as LeetCode to learn C++ is a waste of time. That site is there for experienced C++ programmers who have time to answer some random puzzle questions. An experienced C++ programmer would know right away to test for an empty stack first. — PaulMcKenzie 40 secs ago
 
8:57 AM
ML Classification 0.009658366397877908 (Old classification 0.4)
@AdityaKurrodu The point is: the compiler reported the warning and identified the trigger that caused the warning... Its name "format-extra-args" indicates that the compilation settings for that check are enabled... Compilers are usually much more clever than most programmers, and polite, too... Take heed of what the compiler is telling you and your career will be much less stressful. — Fe2O3 45 secs ago
 
9:22 AM
ML Classification 0.21460330732418328 (Old classification 0.0)
This doesn't look pythonic, nor aligned to any software engineering practices. I'd suggest to try out some testing framework. As mentioned above – unittest, or my personal favourite Pytest are nice options. — Max Skoryk 6 secs ago
 
9:37 AM
Edits fetched for 247312: 6. quota remaining 8880
Edits fetched for 247312: 6. quota remaining 8873
 
 
6 hours later…
3:15 PM
ML Classification 0.33090082200444676 (Old classification 0.0)
 
 
3 hours later…
6:13 PM
2022-08-09T18:09:47.369924Z Quota has been reset. Was 8260 is now 9999
 
6:23 PM
ML Classification 0.03271955372423637 (Old classification 0.4)
Yes. This is something Windows programmers often miss, because the Windows linker will keep cycling through the libraries to satisfy external references. The Linux linker does not. — Tim Roberts 13 secs ago
ML Classification 0.06851766130640098 (Old classification 0.0)
Stackoverflow works best when you ask questions about specific problems. "How do I write a complete application that does X" is probably too broad, even if it is a simple toy app. On the subject of which, this feels like the sort of thing that is given as an assignment so please read the Open letter to students with homework problems and How do I ask and answer homework questions?. — Quentin 8 secs ago
 
7:00 PM
ML Classification 0.001124059810389149 (Old classification 0.43)
you may have the most common problem: page may use JavaScript to add/update elements but BeautifulSoup/lxml, requests/urllib can't run JS. You may need Selenium to control real web browser which can run JS. OR use (manually) DevTools in Firefox/Chrome (tab Network) to see if JavaScript reads data from some URL. And try to use this URL with requests. JS usually gets JSON which can be easy converted to Python dictionary (without BS). You can also check if page has (free) API for programmers. — furas 52 secs ago
 
7:31 PM
ML Classification 0.13047931763894097 (Old classification 0.4)
Why not provide feedback on how to improve a question when or before downvoting it to allow the poster to edit it? To get downvoted without feedback creates an unwelcoming attitude towards new users/beginner programmers, penalizing and potentially banning them from asking more questions. — Sam Miller 58 secs ago
 
7:52 PM
Edits fetched for 154533: 4. quota remaining 9881
Edits fetched for 154533: 4. quota remaining 9872
 
8:10 PM
 
8:36 PM
ML Classification 0.005604293483929135 (Old classification 0.4)
They are likely projecting the notion "We adhere to e.g. the google java code styleguide here" onto "all java programmers on the planet use this styleguide". If the styleguide wasn't explicitly called out for the exercise, this reviewer is just plain wrong. They can refer you to a style guide and then ask you to reformat it, but they shouldn't be dinging you. — rzwitserloot 48 secs ago
 
9:01 PM
Software recommendations -> softwarerecs.stackexchange.com. That said, XNA is deprecated, if you just want some simple 3D graphics, take a look at Wpf 3D, or helix 3D for some added functionality. — JonasH 47 secs ago
ML Classification 0.04531924739313091 (Old classification 0.4)
How do you know Lisa Marie Scott's last name isn't Marie Scott? Or their first name isn't Lisa Marie? Required reading: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About NamesHoneyBadger 1 min ago
 
9:45 PM
ML Classification 0.7972596691988776 (Old classification 0.0)
 
10:40 PM
softwarerecs.stackexchange.com might accept your question. Check their rules first. It's off-topic on SO. — PM 77-1 10 secs ago
 
11:36 PM
ML Classification 6.634010408912652E-4 (Old classification 0.4)
@Lucan If you ask a person to provide you with a "Reprex" that person will have no idea what you are talking about. "Reprex" is a made-up word. I might as well ask people for a "Ulorm", or an "Evocolary", or a "Wutox". Computer programmers have there own nomenclature, to be sure. We can talk about "function calls" and "class objects". However, "reprex" is not a standard term used in software-development. Just say, something like "reproducible example". reprexs are like a free lunch in the sense that they do not exist. — Samuel Muldoon 51 secs ago
 

« first day (2758 days earlier)      last day (634 days later) »