Most important thing is make it work. list comprehension mentioned above is the most concise way to do it. A loop is probably a little clearer for beginning programmers. your code f1(list1[:]) will pass in a copy of the list to f1, iteration would have to happen in the f1 method. — LhasaDad 12 secs ago

SO is not a site for locating tutorials. It is for specific questions related to programming (code) or use of a programmers tool (IDE, compiler, etc.). This question does not meet the site guidelines. You'll find your experiences here will be much better if you spend some time taking the tour and reading the help center pages to learn how the site works before you begin posting. — Ken White 22 secs ago

Try softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/43129/… — d4rk4ng31 49 secs ago

Good question. See Why do bitwise operators have lower priority than comparisons? — John Kugelman 46 secs ago

There does not seem to be a practical programming problem to solve here. The question is primarily opinion based. This seems more appropriate for either codereview.stackexchange.com (if you can provide a complete, self-contained example as required for that site) or softwareengineering.stackexchange.com (where broader, open-ended software engineering topics are tolerated better). — Peter Duniho 44 secs ago

the first half of your question is very vague. What is malformed? Simply missing padding, or wrong characters in the string? Any example? The second half is simply off-topic, as we don't allow questions for software recommendations. — jps 5 secs ago

Well, it it quite common practice. See this. — KUTlime 12 secs ago

Open letter to students with homework problems — Andreas 14 secs ago

@Gurkiratsingh, nothing in Ali's comment is even remotely "spreading hate". Ali is trying to help you. Here's a bit more: Please read Open Letter to Students with Homework Problems and How to Ask. You can't just dump your problem statement here and expect us to do it for you. — Chris 34 secs ago

Since LPCTSTR appears to be a char *, then my next guess is that converting from Rust’s UTF-8 string is disallowed. You could try using a byte string (b"foo") instead. — Shepmaster 45 secs ago

@SoftwareEngineer Thanks, i go to re-post there — last-redman 55 secs ago

processors dont use compilers, programmers use compilers and are free to choose which compiler they want to use for a particular target (there are many different choices for qualcomm for example that any one user can choose). — old_timer 59 secs ago

If you want software recommendations, ask here: softwarerecs.stackexchange.com — mzjn 38 secs ago

Are software recommendations allowed on SO these days? — CD001 58 secs ago

@JimB There's a small amount more overhead on a channel. But atomic operations have the downside that too many programmers think they're cheap. They are not cheap. And if someone screws up and allocates multiple atomic values on the same cache line and then uses them from different threads, performance goes to trash. Channels are a lot smarter than that. — Zan Lynx 25 secs ago

thank you, didn't know softwarerecs! — testo 19 secs ago

@ZanLynx, yes I am very aware, and channels are cheap in general, but using them implies coordinating goroutines which is not cheap relative to atomic operations (and while there are worst-case examples like you mention, there are other ways to thrash the cpu cache, and there is the converse that many atomic operations are essentially free). Of course one needs to know what they are doing when using them, but I have also seen so many programmers make unmaintainable messes of goroutines and channels when simple mutex or atomic would suffice. — JimB 15 secs ago

StackOverflow is for getting help with your code, not asking general questions about programming languages. Maybe softwareengineering.stackexchange.com would be a better place to ask? — Random Davis 52 secs ago

@ChristianGibbons: Certainly not; the “Fast Inverse Square Root” uses specifics of the IEEE-754 binary32 floating-point representation as well as characteristics of floating-point arithmetic, and the task of adapting the algorithm to fixed-point arithmetic is a software engineering issue. — Eric Postpischil 57 secs ago

What happened when you tried it? Also, it would help future programmers, if you could explain what, precisely, is unclear to you about the syntax documentation. That way, the Ruby developers can improve the documentation so that future developers don't stumble over the same problems you did. Essentially, you would make the world a better place, and who wouldn't want that? — Jörg W Mittag 5 secs ago

You are guilty of the crime of premature optimization. You have already wasted more of your time thinking about this then you will ever spend initializing Color instances. C# programmers rarely have a good time when worrying about machine language. — Tim Roberts 15 secs ago

New programmers tend to think that formatting of the code is not important. That is not true. It is extremely important. It allows to see the program structure and even spot different errors. In the form it is currently presented it is simply not readable. — Eugene Sh. 9 secs ago

softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6166/… — sticky bit 14 secs ago

@Camilo I do a lot of TPM. If this kind of code actually passes to the interpreter, this syntax hijacking should be avoided. Its ambiguity turns into a nightmare for those who will have to maintain and develop this kind of code, which is what we call bad syntax. programmers end up building complex conditions in part one, then they do the same on part two. — Mister Jojo 21 secs ago

Please read this open letter to students with homework problems. — azurefrog 40 secs ago