Welcome to Stack Overflow. SO is a question and answer page for professional and enthusiastic programmers. Add your own code to your question. You are expected to show at least the amount of research you have put into solving this question yourself. — Cyrus 29 secs ago

@john thanks john haha you are correct :) fixed my code with comment of other great programmers! — jamesdean 36 secs ago

Welcome to Stack Overflow. SO is a question and answer page for professional and enthusiastic programmers. Add your own code to your question. You are expected to show at least the amount of research you have put into solving this question yourself. — Cyrus 39 secs ago

Welcome to Stack Overflow. SO is a question and answer page for professional and enthusiastic programmers. Add your own code to your question. You are expected to show at least the amount of research you have put into solving this question yourself. — Cyrus 16 secs ago

Welcome to Stack Overflow. SO is a question and answer page for professional and enthusiastic programmers. Add your own code to your question. You are expected to show at least the amount of research you have put into solving this question yourself. — Cyrus 24 secs ago

Can you please tell us why you consider downvoting the post first before asking for any corrections? We are new users and also we are not advanced programmers and still have to learn how this site works. Please do not discourage us on our journey of understanding the website by downvoting our posts and rather please correct us and rest assured we will follow the rules of the website. And finally thank you for pointing us in the right direction. — ElectronicsPro 37 secs ago

@UmarFarooq -- The authors for the compilers and linkers you're using are not new college students or amateur programmers. They are some of the best programmers in the business. They will not write these tools with the knowledge that when they lay out the variables, they're foolishly "wasting memory". — PaulMcKenzie 25 secs ago

Welcome to Stack Overflow. SO is a question and answer page for professional and enthusiastic programmers. Add your own code to your question. You are expected to show at least the amount of research you have put into solving this question yourself. — Cyrus 8 secs ago

@Ross I am wondering if this might be better suited to softwareengineering.stackexchange.com It is a bit broad and opinion based, making it off topic for SO — Nkosi 36 secs ago

softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/410584/…. Thanks so much! I'm really keen to hear people's thoughts. I want to make sure that I push for the right things and quality and stability of our software is a really high priority for me personally! — Ross 31 secs ago

In fact, @Jarod42 said it was pedantically UB. Old C programmers used to make no difference between a 2D NxM array and a 1D N*M one because they have the same representation. So all compilers I know still accept it for compatibility reasons. — Serge Ballesta 53 secs ago

and of course it is rude when u tell other programmers that they dont know how a "simple function works just go read about it" i didn't use this function in my website before and i cant possibly make zero errors in coding, thats why i came asking for help but obviously you just dont wanna help at all. dont look down on others!! @CBroe — nemesis 22 secs ago

stop being rude and pretending like you're better than me, i created a full on website so yes i am an actual programmer. youre just a sad man that wants to make himself feel better by being arrogant and rude and disrespectful to other programmers on the internet @CBroe — nemesis 46 secs ago

Metaprogramming is about programs manipulating programs, not just programs manipulating themselves. An insight: a programming language manipulating itself (or just other programs in the same langauge) is limited in what it can do, to what the langauge designers built in. If you want universally strong metaprogrammng, you have to step outside the language to tools designed to do it. See softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/257441/12135 — Ira Baxter 45 secs ago

Now I understand what you're asking for. Take a look at this question. Looks like it covers your interest. So, taking into account that there are two approaches, you need to pick one that suits you the best. — cassandrad 48 secs ago

I think, it's better to ask this question on softwareengineering.stackexchange.com — Pavel Anikhouski 1 min ago

Questions that ask "where do I start?" are typically too broad and are not a good fit for this site. People have their own method for approaching the problem and because of this there cannot be a correct answer. Give a good read over Where to Start and edit your post. — Dharman 14 secs ago

I'm voting to close this question because licensing advice is off-topic on Stack Overflow. You may be able to get help on SoftwareEngineering.SE, but read their faq carefully before proceeding. Legal questions may be asked on Law.SE. — Machavity 25 secs ago

For such questions try softwarerecs.stackexchange.com site. Make sure to get acquainted with their policies first. On SO it's out-of-scope and will be closed soon. — PM 77-1 42 secs ago

This question looks like it's about how to architect a solution to this problem, rather than a specific coding question. You can get good answers to that on our sister site, softwareengineering.stackexchange.com! — J. Antonio Perez 56 secs ago

You can delete this one, yeah. But the text is good! You can pretty much copy and paste what you have here into softwareengineering.stackexchange.com! — J. Antonio Perez 23 secs ago

Both push_back and emplace_back move when provided with an object of type A&&. The thing with moving an object is that it doesn't prevent the destructor being called, because cleanup may still need to occur. There are proposals to allow programmers to indicate that objects are trivially movable to avoid superfluous destructor calls, but those haven't been accepted into the standard yet. — J. Antonio Perez 41 secs ago

For Kotlin programmers, it should work like this button.layoutParams = ConstraintLayout.LayoutParams(ConstraintLayout.LayoutParams.‌​WRAP_CONTENT, ViewGroup.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) — Jens van de Mötter 26 secs ago

@UzairAshraf outdated is a strong claim there. I don't know if I'd agree that class syntax is meant to replace classical JavaScript prototypal syntax. There seems to be a pretty large amount of people that seem to hate the new class syntax and see it as backwards and for people whose backgrounds are not "real" JavaScript programmers. — user120242 21 secs ago