Please note that Stack Overflow is not the right place for career advice. Check out Where to ask for general advice for young programmers? for suggestions on more appropriate and effective forums. — kaylum 24 secs ago

Would Software Engineering be an appropriate site for design? — Pranav 1 min ago

@skydakis It compiles without any error -- I see this from a lot of new programmers, that if the compile is ok, then the program is also ok. A program compiling ok only means there are no syntax errors -- it has no bearing on whether there are logical errors. — PaulMcKenzie 1 min ago

Using global variables is something beginning programmers over-use and something experienced programmers avoid like the plague. Using a function and passing in the arguments is the right way to go. You can either do what @TomKarzes suggests and use default values for named variables, or you could consider passing in a list of values and writing the function so it can deal with any number of values. — Grismar 13 secs ago

I'm voting to close this question because project management is off-topic on Stack Overflow. You can ask these questions on SoftwareEngineering.SE and ProjectManagement.SE. — double-beep 17 secs ago

@SoftwareEngineer I changed http://0.0.0.0:10000/ to dss:10000 and get invalid URL prefix in conf — demonLaMagra 25 secs ago

The question should be reversed. If all that's needed is to have a GetAwaiter() method, why add an interface? It's not needed. This particular detail won't help most programmers though, as only very specialised code would even need to implement this. Code like the one found in Task and ValueTask. Applications should return one of those types, not try to implement the method — Panagiotis Kanavos 51 secs ago

This is an off-topic question: "4. Questions asking us to recommend or find a book, tool, software library, tutorial or other off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it." Stack Overflow is not a site providing programmers doing your job for you or helping you out in this general way. — Niklas E. 36 secs ago

Don't worry too much about efficiency, especially when you're just learning. Even professional programmers tend to value simplicity, readability, and maintainability much more than performance for the vast majority of code. — Dejke 48 secs ago

@caldwellst I understand, but guided by the fact that plotting with that thresholds is a programming topic, I came to the conclusion that maybe someone from the programmers will be able to help me with the code to search for thresholds equations, since mathematicians are not very active in this topic. — Vitalіі 9 secs ago

@SoftwareEngineer I think I may have completely confused myself with how all of this stuff works. The outcome I want is for the user to be able to connect to each app. as they are 2 different applications, the applications do not talk directly to each other. Will update my question to reflect this. — demonLaMagra 33 secs ago

Question: do you have to use regex to parse addresses? Because addresses are already notoriously badly handled already it seems throwing a regex at them is an extremely bad idea since if the address deviates even slightly you end up in uncharted territory. You could write a parser that has a higher success rate and better tolerance for unexpected addresses but it's still going to fail. — VLAZ 51 secs ago

This is a typical example of naming that emphasises one aspect of an entity (e.g. function) that was foremost in the mind of the programmer at the time, given his context, but is not the most useful option in the broad context of any other developer. We often fall into this trap as programmers - naming is so important for discoverability, it's worth stopping and thinking about the different contexts and choosing the most appropriate one. — Cornel Masson 57 secs ago

not the immediate problem, but you shouldnt be using new here and certainly not *new Data{1}. Read Why should C++ programmers minimize the use of new? — idclev 463035818 16 secs ago

There is none. The Second is just a short form that was added later so that programmers would not have to keep writing redundant code. It is called the "diamond operator" — OH GOD SPIDERS 11 secs ago

Have you benchmarked something like that too see how expensive of an operation it is? Unless you determine that it's a bottleneck, you shouldn't yet worry about making these sort of micro-optimizations. See stackoverflow.com/questions/3470990/… and softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/80084/…. — Broots Waymb 21 secs ago

For the No 2 question you should see this post (softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/134118/…). This link is also mentioned below by @Sanich — LiTTle 35 secs ago

For the No 2 question someone should see this post (softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/134118/…). This link, you reference below, deserves to be here. It will be helpful for new-comers. Directly below the question. — LiTTle 20 secs ago

Okay you are always going to have issues with the code produced by the Designer for numerous reasons the foremost being is that it is untouchable black-box code which most quality programmers will not use unless they absolutely have to. So I strongly suggest that you stop using the Designer to make your GUIs as using straight Python-Qt is just as easy if not easier and definitely a lot friendly to work with. If you would like more extensive help with learning Python-Qt I teach it online for free and if you are comfortable with it just give me a way to contact you here or you can contact me — Dennis Jensen 45 secs ago

I'm voting to close this question because project management is off-topic on Stack Overflow. You can ask these questions on SoftwareEngineering.SE and ProjectManagement.SE. — double-beep 1 min ago

@double-beep Well, it's definitely about programming (using tools commonly used by programmers is on-topic here), but it's also opinion-based. — TylerH 47 secs ago

Requests for software recommendations are off-topic. — Jonathon Reinhart 25 secs ago

Just because the asked question is usually the wrong approach doesn't mean it always is. Sometimes programmers need to do things not because it is a good idea, but nonetheless, there are external factors compelling it (e.g. a stubborn boss, shortsighted requirements, etc.). Or there might even be unusual circumstances where it does make sense. Answering the question as-is would be a disservice, but part of the purpose of Stack Overflow is to provide a knowledge base for future Google searchers. The actual question shouldn't be entirely ignored. — Dominick Pastore 36 secs ago

@LostCrotchet: Language designers should focus on ways of helping programmers write good code, not on trying to prevent them from writing bad code, or worse, preventing them from writing code that would meet a programmer's objectives in a way that the language designer doesn't like. — supercat 11 secs ago

You use new when you want to create a new object in dynamic storage. If you are pointing at an already existing object, there is no need for new. In fact, you should save new for when you are forced to use it. — user4581301 11 secs ago

Hi Siavash, I'm a software engineer at Google and I'd like to include a screenshot of this question in a research paper we're writing, to showcase some representative questions about TensorFlow. If that's alright with you, could you release your question under a permissive license? A comment saying e.g. "I license this StackOverflow question under the Apache License 2.0" would be sufficient for us. Thanks, David — David Bieber 31 secs ago

Hi Kevin, I'm a software engineer at Google and I'd like to include a screenshot of this question in a research paper we're writing, to showcase some representative questions about TensorFlow. If that's alright with you, could you release your question under a permissive license? A comment saying e.g. "I license this StackOverflow question under the Apache License 2.0" would be sufficient for us. Thanks, David — David Bieber 59 secs ago

@ArdentCoder You can have pointers to arrays too :-) int (*pointerToArray)[4] = &nums; Like I said, arrays are distinct types. But the size is fixed in the array type, so this isn't useful if you want variable-sized arrays. That's why C programmers use simple pointers and length. C++ programs use things like std::vector, std::array, std::span, etc. — alter igel 27 secs ago

I'm voting to close this question because licensing advice is off-topic on Stack Overflow. You may be able to get help on SoftwareEngineering.SE, but read their faq carefully before proceeding. Legal questions may be asked on Law.SE. — Machavity 25 secs ago

Also, see What is decoupling? — John Wu 26 secs ago

If you are aware of that, then please don’t propagate this mistake for the millions of future programmers to make. — quamrana 53 secs ago

And, your last sentence if specifically off-topic here as you can't be asking for 3rd party tool or library recommendations here. You can try at Software Recommendations. — jfriend00 26 secs ago

If you have a main doing this, you could move the implementation to a different function and just have the main call copy_file(argv[0], argv[1]); and compare the output to a golden file — Ryan Haining 24 secs ago

Computers do exactly what you say. Precision in writing code is important. Sure, then writing text to people, it is not as important to be precise, but we are programmers, and applying a bit of the same rigorousness to text, that we apply to code, helps prevent confusion. — Andreas 24 secs ago

as you strive to become a productive software engineer you must strive to become independent .. its far faster and more effective to learn how to google to discover answers on your own than its is to post questions and wait for answers ... never post a question unless you have invested hours doing your own research ... and if you must post a question always include nuggets of valuable information you have gleaned which act to reward perspective folk who read your question and to entice them to post an answer ... this forum is a two way street ... remember we all have little free time to dawdle — Scott Stensland 41 secs ago