« first day (1782 days earlier)      last day (1615 days later) » 

12:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-07T00:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
12:36 AM
ML Classification 3.430404599494692E-4 (Old classification 0.55)
It doesn't matter what they told you, because this is not their site. Questions asked here must be in compliance with this site's guidelines, and the guidelines here are exactly as I explained before. Contact LinkedIn Customer Service for questions that are not specifically about programming (code) related to their API. The only questions that may be asked here are about programming (code) or use of programmers tools. We cannot speak on behalf of off-site, third party vendors, their services, licensing, or issues specific to your account. — Ken White 44 secs ago
 
1:20 AM
ML Classification 0.0017517147899936802 (Old classification 0.4)
I'm thinking we'll need a minimal reproducible example to give you a 100% correct answer that's useful to other programmers in the future. — user4581301 1 min ago
 
1:45 AM
ML Classification 0.01226420728848676 (Old classification 0.0)
Welcome to Stack Overflow. Please read Open Letter to Students with Homework Problems. You can't just dump your problem statement here and expect us to do it for you. It's also a good idea to take the tour, read about what's on-topic in the help center, and How to Ask. — Chris 27 secs ago
 
2:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-07T02:00:00.006Z and @Duga is alive
 
2:11 AM
ML Classification 0.0133298662125117 (Old classification 0.6)
You asked this question before and were told that this site is for specific questions related to programming (code) or use of programmers tools, and that is was not a site for polling or collecting lists. There is still not a specific question related to programming in the post. — Ken White 55 secs ago
 
2:45 AM
Edits fetched for 233568: 2. quota remaining 9280
 
3:40 AM
ML Classification 0.10574895513238147 (Old classification 0.4)
It's not a programming question. It's not about what is supported by current processors or OSes. It's asking for speculation about what might be possible now and in the future. It's not a specific question related to programming (code) or use of a programmers tool. It does not fit within the current site guidelines in What topics can I ask about here?, but more in What questions should I avoid asking?.as far as being primarily opinion-based and asking for discussion. — Ken White 50 secs ago
 
4:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-07T04:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
1 hour later…
5:15 AM
ML Classification 0.04261756992407575 (Old classification 0.0)
@Software Engineer <%@ taglib prefix = "c" uri = "http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core" %> is an import that you add to the top of the jsp file. — Dot Batch 48 secs ago
 
6:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-07T06:00:00.007Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
1 hour later…
7:10 AM
ML Classification 0.0022261339556156174 (Old classification 0.4)
When I look at my code in my head -- Use the debugger that comes with your compiler. Programmers do not just rely on the code "in their head". They use the debugger to single-step through the execution of the code to see where the code diverges from what they have "in their head". — PaulMcKenzie 22 secs ago
Edits fetched for 233572: 2. quota remaining 8959
Edits fetched for 233544: 2. quota remaining 8954
ML Classification 1.9579036731729322E-4 (Old classification 0.4)
There are some uses of volatile that are NOT deprecated, because they are useful (e.g. in code that directly loads or stores from specified memory locations, such as in device drivers). Quite a few of the "deprecated uses" are related to ability to use features that too many progammers use - incorrectly - as a means of making a variable access atomic. The C++ library now (since C++11) provides a correct means of ensuring atomic access of variables, so it makes sense to discourage programmers from incorrectly using volatile when the intent is atomic access. — Peter 39 secs ago
 
8:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-07T08:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
2 hours later…
10:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-07T10:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
10:39 AM
ML Classification 0.07780598413937294 (Old classification 0.0)
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic. See the warning on the agile tag "QUESTIONS ABOUT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODS AND PRACTICES OR PROJECT MANAGEMENT ARE OFF-TOPIC. Please consider Software Engineering or Project Management Stack Exchanges for these questions." — DavidW 56 secs ago
ML Classification 0.07780598413937294 (Old classification 0.0)
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic. See the warning on the agile tag "QUESTIONS ABOUT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODS AND PRACTICES OR PROJECT MANAGEMENT ARE OFF-TOPIC. Please consider Software Engineering or Project Management Stack Exchanges for these questions." — DavidW 54 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
11:47 AM
ML Classification 0.00888021633813073 (Old classification 0.4)
I would like to highlight to viewers that this is actually a great question. Bit manipulation is not something that all programmers are strong with, and knowing the conventional hex/octal prefixes for integers is not exactly "fundamental" across the board. — CinchBlue 34 secs ago
 
12:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-07T12:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
1 hour later…
1:22 PM
As the creator and lead developer of the open-source documentation tool Doxygen, you might be interested in posting an answer to this new question: Free tools to assist code reading. — karel 36 secs ago
 
1:45 PM
Edits fetched for 233209: 3. quota remaining 8484
 
2:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-07T14:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
2:53 PM
ML Classification 0.03674190392986703 (Old classification 0.4)
It's just an overwhelming question for me, I feel like I almost solved it, there is very little left, but I can't reach my goals because of a lack of experience! So I ask the help of more experienced programmers, that's all!) — Andrii Havrylyak 19 secs ago
Edits fetched for 233588: 3. quota remaining 8394
 
4:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-07T16:00:00.007Z and @Duga is alive
 
4:51 PM
2019-12-07T16:51:00.331Z Quota has been reset. Was 8261 is now 9999
 
5:13 PM
ML Classification 3.00995679879556E-4 (Old classification 0.43)
@D.Nathanael Unfortunately we cannot make that assumption about pass by value and being copied because we don't know the specifics of underlying data structure. In some cases. You might be surprised to learn that passing by reference treats things differently than by pointer. For example, all the usual operators to the object apply, so it is in fact possible to make a copy of the object in his example even though it is passed by reference. This is a major distinction programmers need to realize. — Paul Renton 12 secs ago
 
6:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-07T18:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
2 hours later…
8:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-07T20:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
8:27 PM
ML Classification 0.08614141509743993 (Old classification 0.0)
 
 
2 hours later…
10:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-07T22:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
10:21 PM
ML Classification 0.519556893249022 (Old classification 0.0)
I'm voting to close this question because questions about the software development process and software engineering, including quality assurance, architecture & design are off topic on Stack Overflow. You might try posting on SoftwareEngineering.SE. — Dharman 53 secs ago
ML Classification 0.02379218177712718 (Old classification 0.4)
We're programmers, not psychics. We cannot read your mind and see your code. You have to actually show it to us by posting it in your question. — MarsAtomic 42 secs ago
 
10:53 PM
Opinion-based questions are generally frowned upon here. You might have better luck asking on softwarerecs.stackexchange.comDavid Wilson 47 secs ago
 
11:24 PM
ML Classification 0.05330873198134169 (Old classification 0.0)
Please read Open letter to students with homework problems. The learning effect is much higher if you figure out the problem yourself or ask your instructor for help. — Turing85 38 secs ago
 
11:45 PM
Mathieu Guindon vs. Simon Forsberg: 17163 diff. Year: +1143. Quarter: +410. Month: +30. Week: +30. Day: 0.
 

« first day (1782 days earlier)      last day (1615 days later) »