You do realize you're encouraging non-programmers to ask for free snippets giving this answer to the above question, right? — Andrei Gheorghiu 49 secs ago

That is why every computer program is different!!!! If your data and inputs are always the same then you would need only one computer program and you can fire all the software programmers because you wouldn't need them any more. When you change your input requirements your program changes. When the shoe fits wear it. When the shoe doesn't fit get a different one. — jdweng 34 secs ago

@MatheusIanzer Never mess with working code until you confirm that it works. "All I did" is irrelevant - everyone says that. It's the software engineering equivalent of "hold my beer, watch this". Get it working as-is first, then commit to git, then change a small thing, verify that it still works, commit, and keep going like that, in small chunks. And yes, use git, even on little examples. Make it a habit. Then you'll embrace change instead of dreading it. — Kuba Ober 52 secs ago

This is more a software engineering question and its all opinion based imo. Though personally i feel your pain, when i see more than 3 or 4 services injected into a class my OCD kicks off. Though the fact you have so many services injecting into the one place smells a bit well, refactorish — TheGeneral 47 secs ago

Is this a programming questoin? Outlook is not a software only used by programmers. — user202729 56 secs ago

On the bright side, did you know about this StackExchange site ? — Edward 20 secs ago

Well, that instantly makes it obvious. A strong caution about the Bunifu framework you are using, it is very troublesome. Judging from the large number of question it has been generating lately, programmers tend to get sucked-in by the spackle, but it is still far from being stable enough to survive the average abuse it tends to get exposed to. Seems it can't deal well with the spinner control size becoming 0 * 0 pixels. The kind of problem you can bypass by using my advice: improve it by hiding instead of minimizing the window. — Hans Passant 13 secs ago

@StephenCleary Thank you. Does singlaR would be relevant in this scenario link — Bruno 34 secs ago

I would hate to work on codebase where programmers have made such structs and then mechanically reinterpret between those. In actual reality geographical coordinate data from different external origins and/or to different external targets is different (see GEOREF, UTM, MGRS, GARS and USNG). Programmers should not add to it by making lot of dumb differently named structs that are in essence just a pair of doubles with unknown unit, accuracy and validity. Instead they should use one (and only one) real class and convert to other formats maximally close to external interfaces. — Öö Tiib 14 secs ago

And adding a check just for the direct case feels "wrong" because it (slightly) slows down all correct code and most programmers should be capable of avoiding an accidental, direct set-in-a-set case (once they know about it). — TripeHound 29 secs ago

Please update your question by improving the formatting of the code. Python is sensitive to indentation, as are python programmers. — quamrana 55 secs ago

This is all very subjective and probably better for the software engineering stack exchange site. However if you mean Model as in data model, no keep it away from there. Depending on your architecture and the size of your program, it probably makes sense to either inject it into your VM or if you have some sort of business layer, it maybe better suited there. however on saying all that, this is all subjective, and i have simply no idea on your requirements and existing architecture — TheGeneral 42 secs ago

The tf.data API provides mechanisms to deal with datasets that do not fit in memory, take a look at the programming guide. — jdehesa 43 secs ago

A typical PLC runs an interpreter to execute the user application. Pick a an interpreted language, implement the interpreter. An answer as broad as your question! "The steps" is to misunderstand the software engineering process - there is no one approach to whole system development. — Clifford 53 secs ago

The wiki list looks pretty exhaustive. If you are looking for free tools, then there aren't many options. You might want to ask this over at softwarerecs.stackexchange.com since tool recommendations are explicitly off-topic on SO. — Lundin 49 secs ago

@Ascalonian the only users will be programmers though. I don't think many SU would know the answer to this. — Robino 40 secs ago

Yeah, Python. Python was not designed with Software Engineering in mind, so it doesn't have a lot of the tweaks that makes things like C# and Java better in that particular area. — Mike Wise 7 secs ago

I'm not sure how much you know about modules in general, but you might find this answer of mine on SoftwareEngineering.SE helpful -- basically when you do require('./x') inside y.js, you get the in progress, partially-built exports object from the x module. At the time x requires y, x hasn't yet added function2 to its exports object, and it won't do so until its call to require('./y') finished and it can execute the final line in x.js. I have not thought hard enough about how to fix this problem, though. — apsillers 27 secs ago

I'm voting to close this question because licensing advice is off-topic on Stack Overflow. You may be able to get help on SoftwareEngineering.SE, but read their faq carefully before proceeding. Legal questions may be asked on Law.SE — Machavity 52 secs ago

Yet more: softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/335651/… — mortb 1 min ago

There are several .NET process interop mechanisms. It all depends on how easy it is to serialize the object, but programmers tend to favor WCF for "complex objects". — Hans Passant 23 secs ago

This looks more like a software engineering question to me, where it has been discussed before: softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/search?q=crash+early — Martin R 1 min ago

Yes, but language does play a part. For instance, Swift has properties. Java doesn't. Yet in Swift you could emulate java's getter/setter with private variables instead of properties. Is it wrong from a software engineering perspective? No. Is it wrong from a Swift perspective? I'd argue yes. — MarqueIV 51 secs ago

Side rant. In the discussion last week, another user said that they don't use as! because Swift Lint flags it as an error. I hate it when we have to program in a certain way to satisfy a static analysis tool instead of what makes sense as a Software Engineer. Good tools let you say, go away, I know what I'm doing here. — vacawama 57 secs ago

You might want to post this to the SoftwareEngineering StackExchange site — Vasan 1 min ago

You have a possible unfounded concern that your code is not fast enough. Test it. You're wasting development time with premature optimization. Spend you time where it is needed, not on nebulous "concerns". — Andreas 47 secs ago

Thank you for the recommendation, I'll check it up. Stackoverflow lets you ask questions regarding "software tools commonly used by programmers", and dev tools performance/configuration questions seems to be relevant for the category. At least questions like this Visual Studio debugging/loading very slow or this How to explore what Visual Studio is.. are of the same kind. — YMC 5 secs ago

How do you actually go about embedding? What code are you writing? (If you're not writing code, you're in the wrong place. Stack Overflow is for programmers.) — TRiG 37 secs ago

The only problem is for some reason -- If this is a school assignment, you're being graded on you finding out what that "some reason" is by yourself. That means debugging, a mandatory practice that programmers must endeavor in. — PaulMcKenzie 18 secs ago

see also: softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/123956/… — givanse 16 secs ago

Existence of other questions does not automatically make this one on-topic. You're not asking about a programming (code) or programmers tool (IDE, API, compiler, etc.) problem. What topics can I ask about here? can provide more details. — Ken White 18 secs ago