@MadScientist could you elaborate on thay please? Do we need to reframe the answers? Or we need a separate meta post for each answer? How should we frame it then? :/

hello

hello

@SBM "Chemical transmission is more common in invertebrates and electrical transmission is more common in vertebrates" is this statement true?

I think yes but I'm not sure as I'm a noob

sorry

Why do you think it is true?

@Chris do you think the statement above is true?

@AbdullahUYU transmission of what? Action potential?

@chris if you get some time, please help me out with the meta post . As I see, all the mods are quite busy at the moment, and I think that extending the time period of the post would only be a waste of time. What am I supposed to do then? I've already put a notice that I'll close the post tomorrow :/

If we can help you out in any way, please let us (@theforestecologist also seems to be interested in helping)

@another'Homosapien' yeah action potential

oh let me rewrite it "Chemical synapses are more common in invertebrates, electrical synapses are more common in vertebrates"

It was thought that electrical synapses were more abundant in invertebrates and cold-blooded vertebrates and less prevalent in mammals...The more recent demonstration of the ubiquitous presence of electrical synapses in the mammalian brain led to the indisputable conclusion that chemical and electrical transmissions co-exist in all nervous systems.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091911

@AbdullahUYU does this help?

So there is no substantial difference in frequency of existence of synapses in invertebrates and vertebrates @another'Homosapien'

by the way yes, this is what i am interested in. thank you