Obvious troll is obvious. — apaul 40 secs ago

@Astralbee - The first paragraph says there is nothing wrong with her husband liking oral sex, which is 100% correct. If he demanded oral sex, then that would be wrong, but he is not wrong to like it. Even knowing that his wife dislikes it, he would still not be wrong to like it, so long as he accepts that she doesn't like it and does not pressure her to do it anyhow. People like what they like and, as long as they don't feel that their desires create entitlement for the desire to be fulfilled, there is nothing wrong with that. — Dave Sherohman 2 mins ago

You kind of glossed over his quote "if they do hire them, all they're hiring is a future sexual harassment lawsuit." Is there any truth to that? Are there more sexual harassment lawsuits involving women? I have a feeling that you're shutting him down without considering the possibility that he's not wrong, but just coming across as a jerk. — coinbird 1 min ago

@coinbird "all they're hiring is a future sexual harassment lawsuit." suggests that women aren't worth hiring in the first place, since the only thing they contribute is trouble, and aren't worth anything as workers. This is combined with "proudly states companies that don't hire women are doing the right thing" (which, in the US, is a way of harvesting unlawful discrimination suits) makes it pretty clear. — David Thornley 34 secs ago

While I agree that he's probably hurt somehow, and it's coming out like this (the alternative is much worse), you seem to be setting up a false moral equivalence. He's not a monster or evil (at least I hope he's not), but he is wrong. — David Thornley 37 secs ago

This is the best answer. As a guy, it's good advice to never offer someone of the opposite sex a hug. If they want to hug you, trust me, they will. — only_pro 1 min ago