@Adola While effort to improve questions by editing is appreciated, one should be a bit careful with closed posts. The first edit within the five days of closure pushes the question into the reopen review queue - so if some minor edit is done instead, even if there comes later a major improvement by the OP, the edit is not sufficient to push the post in the review queue. See also: Should I avoid minor edit of a question which was put on hold? — Martin Sleziak 4 hours ago

@MartinSleziak Okay, thanks for the information, but it isn't the reason you rejected.. right? However, I do personally believe that it's easier to read: numbers in the middle of a sentence should be in latex and the dots should use the built-in commands. — Adola 3 hours ago

@Adola The linked post on explains the issue with such edits - and that was also a reason why I voted to reject the edit. The problem is that the question would have much better chances in the reopen review queue if it got there after a more substantial edit. (If the question wasn't just recently closed, I would voted to approve such edit.) If some further clarification is needed, feel free to ping me in chat. — Martin Sleziak 19 secs ago