« first day (3933 days earlier)      last day (1087 days later) » 

12:07 AM
The best way to get happy surprises is to expect 0 download, 0 ads displayed and 0 revenue :P
7
 
 
2 hours later…
1:39 AM
@ken Expect very little
I've put a few apps out.
I'm aware of a guy who has a free app on Google play, which has IAPs, and he makes around $200 a month
he put a SHITTON of work into that app though
 
Jon?
 
2:01 AM
> Is there a way to compile my project faster?
...delete all your code.
4
 
@Vaillancourt When you have no expectations, anything is good. That’s also what you gotta think like with eBay.
No one buys because I am small seller. But hey, at least I made a small amount so far and got rid of some old tech.
 
Yeah!
 
 
8 hours later…
10:20 AM
0
Q: Baked lightmap: Parts of scene appear too dark

denisI'm having trouble setting up global illumination in my Unity 2021.1.1 URP project Parts of my scene are appearing completely dark, I'm only using directional light and area light on the windows, here's the baked lightmap view: In the corner as you can see it's completely dark Here's the Shaded...

 
 
3 hours later…
1:02 PM
Morning!
 
nwp
Afternoon!
 
 
2 hours later…
2:37 PM
@Vaillancourt buy more PCs, use Incredibuild
 
nwp
Switch to JavaScript :P
 
:D
 
@Almo Not sure buying more PCs for a single workstation work.
 
Incredibuild distributes building across multiple PCs
 
 
1 hour later…
3:52 PM
Politics on Twitter are arguably the most hilarious thing I have ever seen. 🤣
It never fails to make me laugh!
 
"Politics on Twitter are arguably the most hilarious thing I have ever seen. 🤣".replace("Twitter", "any public platform").replace("hilarious", "depressing").replace(🤣, 🤡)
IMHO.
Usually, I keep in mind that those people can vote.
(and have children)
 
4:08 PM
I know, it’s crazy. I honestly don’t know how we let most of them choose the country’s leader.
 
Let's not joke about voter suppression.
 
No, I’m not joking about it. It’s a bad thing.
Sorry if it came along like that.
 
@Almo Yeah, I wonder starting at what kind of size of project one gains efficiency with it. If it takes more time to send stuff across the network and to get back built component than it would take just to build them locally.
Well I suppose it would mean that I don't have a big project and I should be happy with it.
 
user92578
TBH I kinda like Twitter on politics, fast & quick format and the likes&retweets of the people I follow expose me to more things usually from people with similar values
 
Yeah, I'd agree. I started understanding a lot of issues better when I got to see how folks talk about them among themselves - conversations I normally wouldn't be in.
 
4:25 PM
Most "conversations" I see on Twitter usually involves someone saying something then other people bashing.
Maybe I have had bad experiences.
 
It does make a huge difference who you follow.
The media loves to just dig up random hostility and present it as an important topic when really it's just a few dozen randos who have nothing to do with anything. 😉
 
Maybe I should follow some other people then.
 
5:04 PM
@Vaillancourt Not really a conversation, more like “I’m gonna take you to the parking lot and beat you with my ‘cancel’ hammer because you stated a different opinion.”
 
Don't believe the hype around "cancel culture" - it's mostly just folks with power and influence being surprised other people now have a platform to tell them when they're wrong.
 
DMG is right
 
user92578
Yep.
 
The GOP just kicked Cheney out of her leadership position for not pushing the lie that Trump won the election. That they are the ones screaming most about cancel culture shows the hypocricy.
 
Yeah; that's not that bad around here as this could be interpreted as a death treat and well... it's illegal.
 
5:08 PM
I don’t know. I’ve seen several people on both sides who try to “cancel” things. Both left, and right.
 
so the whole idea of "cancel culture" is ridiculous.
Christian right tried to silence D&D in the 80s
people just naturally do this
it's nothing new.
 
We didn't call it "cancel culture" when the right blacklisted the band formerly known as the Dixie Chicks or football players who kneeled, or when they instituted the Hays Code, etc. It's something they only complain about when ordinary folks have the power speak up against things that they like.
 
pretty much
 
It's just a new moral panic / media buzzword, now that the "political correctness" boogeyman sounds dated. They just need a new manufactured controversy to maintain aggrieved tribal loyalty.
 
You need to be a pundit on these talk shows. You have a very clear way of explaining what's happening.
 
5:16 PM
I don’t think it’s tribal loyalty that keeps a lot of Christians with the GOP. I believe it is how the GOP has an amount of policies (not all of them) that align with the Bible.
 
It's tribal because no amount of logic or reasoning works.
 
Both sides are tribal then.
 
not entirely.
Drug testing for welfare recipients! Well, they tried it. spent like $50 million testing, saved $100k in withheld benefits
logic says "don't drug test welfare recipients"
the religious right says "NOT ONE PENNY OF MY T AXES FOR DRUGS" and refuse to back down
that's tribalism in the face of evidence.
 
Not tribalism. They mostly don’t back down because the Bible goes against many of the policies.
 
There are tribalistic people on the left, I see it on Facebook. But that's not what's happening in the mainstream in Washington at the moment.
Bible for law against evidence is tribalism
We have seperation of church and state
 
5:19 PM
Yes, there are tribalistic republicans. But not all.
 
They are the ones in control
Hence Cheney getting ousted.
If you want the bible in law, then you must be consistent. "Thou shalt not give him thy money upon interest, nor give him thy victuals for increase. ... Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it."
Can't charge interest on loans, dude.
It's just tribalsim in that they pick some things they don't like, and fight them using the bible as a basis while ignoring things they want that the bible is against.
Jesus is VERY clear about divorice: it's a no-no in the absence of adultery
 
Yes, I 100% agree. The issue is many of these loud “Christians” give us who try to state these things a bad wrap. So they just talk over the truth and get us associated with them.
 
(got work to do, not intentionally ignoring further replies) :)
 
Ok. 👌
 
5:35 PM
I'd say "GOP aligns with the Bible" is effective branding and political propaganda, but not in evidence in their actual policies. If Jesus were with us today he'd be arguing for universal healthcare, caring for immigrants instead of turning them away or jailing them at the border, sharing material wealth instead of hoarding it, etc. - all things the GOP consistently opposes.
 
In my opinion, socialism would be a beautiful thing if it worked. The idea of everyone being equal and sharing is great. But, it can’t work due to man’s inherent nature to want more than the other, or not contribute, or other such factors.
 
Okay, so why does universal healthcare work in countries other than the US?
"We're too inherently bad to have nice things" is another politically-effective lie.
 
You can have socialist-ish behaviours without being totally socialist.
 
It doesn’t. They pay more taxes to pay for the “free healthcare” from the government.
 
Not really. The US spends more per capita on healthcare for worse outcomes than countries with universal care.
 
5:40 PM
@DMGregory Not a lie if the Bible says man will never create a wonderful society without God.
 
"God helps those who help themselves" - so I wouldn't take that as a reason to give up without trying to do better for each other.
 
I’m not saying to give up. I’m saying, if we want to have a working society, we must help others and spread the word of God. I’m saying you are right, but God also must be in the picture. But, that is simply my opinion as a Christian.
 
Don't you need to pay for your healthcare insurance?
 
Yes, we do.
 
What's the difference between having to pay a company for it, or to pay for it as a tax?
 
5:46 PM
The difference is the company siphoning off profit instead of putting it all into care, and hiring an army of people to prevent paying out if possible.
Another case of ignoring the facts of the situation to remain in the tribalist state.
 
Another difference is that with the universal version, it's still there for you even if you're between jobs.
 
(back to work again... having trouble getting this written)
 
@Almo I'd argue that hospitals in the US are probably more efficient :P
 
Depends how you define "efficiency".
 
“ The sheer cost of providing quality health care makes universal health care a large expense for governments. 1 Most universal health care is funded by general income taxes or payroll taxes.”
 
5:48 PM
If it's care given per dollar spent, then no, they do far worse than hospitals in other countries.
 
@DMGregory Or bad lucked.
 
If it's wait times, yes, they do better there, mainly by refusing care to tons of folks who might otherwise be in line.
I remember reading a case study where healthcare costs in a particular country decreased when they instituted universal care. It turned out that there was a lot of shady dealing being done by private insurers and hospitals that was artificially driving up costs.
 
@OKprogrammer yes? it costs money. But whether you pay for it via your insurance or via taxes, it still costs money.
Private insurance, whatever it is, will increase the cost of whatever it insures.
 
And you get economies of scale when the government is able to coordinate that spending as a whole, and negotiate drug prices for their whole market. That's why drugs like insulin are orders of magnitude cheaper here than in the US.
And our tax burden is actually not that much higher. We just get more for it, because it's not lining the pockets of private corporations.
 
I spent over 15 years of my adult life uninsured and unable to access medical (or dental) care of anykind. So when people say allowing me access to healthcare makes their healthcare not as good I wanna fight them.
 
5:59 PM
I talk to friends in the US who are feeling unwell but too scared to go to the doctor to even check if something's wrong because they can't afford the visit, and that's absolutely horrifying to me.
That's how minor, easily treatable/preventable issues eventually escalate into emergency room visits, hospital stays, missed work, and all sorts of things that drain the economy more than just getting people the care they need up-front.
 
@OKprogrammer Capitalists tells us that humans are inherently exploitative and then design a system that incentivizes exploitation as a solution. I would argue that the existence of constant growth of organizations revolving around mutual aid actually demonstrates that people are inherently good and it is the system that makes helping others so hard.
 
I was inspired seeing the mutual support groups that sprung up on Facebook here at the start of the pandemic - neighbours helping each other get food or cover rent, for no expectation of return.
 
@OKprogrammer Christian Imperialism is one of the major underlying causes of most of the worlds current traumas. I do not believe spreading the word of the Christian god is a solution to anything.
 
So yeah, "social programs can't work because people are selfish" sounds like an excuse a selfish person will tell you to keep profiting at the expense of others.
 
"Insurance" is the wrong model for health. health is a matter of prevention and maintenance. "Insurance" is for unforseen huge expenses, like hail damage or a hurricane tearing up your town. "Insurance" is horrible for dealing with routine scheduled costs.
Insurance depends on risk pools. Young people don't want health insurance since they're healthy. Ruins the risk pool.
the superior results with less money spent per capita in UHC countries proves this. But the US is tribalistic, and assumes nothing can be learned from anyone beyond their borders.
Tribalism ignoring data is at the root of a lot of the US's problems right now.
 
6:09 PM
Honestly I think it has more to do with the multi-millionaires and billionaires who profit from the current system. That's a lot of money they can use to buy influence and propaganda to keep it the way it is.
Coupled with a lot of cynicism and distrust that governments could ever do anything "good". So hey, if all politics is slimy anyway and no one hopes or strives for anything better, then I might as well support whatever policies will increase my own wealth.
 
I think the tribalism comes into play when those millionaires and billionaires sway the public opinion of the masses to help prevent it ever being any different
That is why wedge issues are part of their power play. They don't care about trans people in sports. They just want us all fighting over it.
And it leads to a great many people consistently voting against their own self-interests.
Because "oh no, the transes are going to [insert falsehood fear mongering]."
 
large media platforms driving fear into people's lives is a big issue.
 
also, it seems there were a lot of strong opinions thrown around in here
 
6:18 PM
The rapid spread of news is both good and bad. Obviously, staying in the now is good, but with a lot of stuff, ignorance is bliss for sanity
 
Yeah. I need to find a more healthy balance with what I read daily.
 
I've heard a lot of people say the world is going crazy, but I don't think we've just suddenly gone wild, only that now it can be plastered onto the internet and throttled down your throat
 
I think you're right. Looking back through history, there are parallels for everything happening today. We just tend to overlook all that.
 
almost every time i open a webpage, or see an ad, it mentions the pandemic and COVID. it's ridiculous, practically every human knows what is going on, but the situation is still being throttled everywhere.
the saying "There is no new sin under the sun" is not very far off
 
At the same time, we do have a lot of folks acting like it's over, when there are still people dying daily. 😥
There's gotta be a better balance of "take it seriously but don't despair" though...
 
6:23 PM
Yeah, and that kinda leads into what i think is the biggest problem in the world: extremism. Throughout our history, most of our worst tragedies from people taking something, and applying the most extreme situation it fits.
 
I'm not sure I'd agree with the second sentence there.
 
yeah I don't buy the second sentence either
 
hmmm
yeah, i didn't word that right, sorry
 
haha nothing to be sorry about
we all calm here :)
 
Yeah, I mess up my phrasing continuously.
 
6:27 PM
i just think a lot of turmoil comes from people not accepting there can be a balance in two opposites
that is a very blanket-y statement but oh well
 
I find this is more common among societies that adhere to one of the Abrahamic religions.
They seem to encourage very B/W thinking
What's the big game in China, Japan and Korea? Go. You win not by wiping out your opponent, but by coexisting with them on the board but having at least one more point of territory than them.
The European countries are on chess: destroy the opposing army and/or its center.
I think this is indicative of their relative cultures and how they view problems.
 
yeah..
i'm Christian, but i think coexisting with people you don't agree with is essential
 
It's supposed to be, anyway. :)
 
it is, but alas, the Church (not the religion itself) has felt the need to be conquerers throughout our history
 
When I first learned about the warrior Popes, I thought, "what?"
 
6:32 PM
even though the goal of the Church is to win people over through preaching and prayer, not going on killing streaks until the survivors give in
 
The one thing I'd watch out for is the appeal to moderation fallacy. When there are two opposed sides, it does not logically follow that the truth must be somewhere between them. That temptation has been exploited to move the Overton window rightward over the past decades.
 
yes The Overton Window is terribly important.
 
spooky
there are some stuff you gotta stand your ground on
 
6:36 PM
 
yeah
When not all sides of an argument are arguing in good faith, you have to know when and stand back.
The "Trump won the election" thing is precisely this.
It's not an opinion that Trump won. It's an outright easily falsafiable lie.
No compromise is needed with that position.
 
 
3 hours later…
9:34 PM
Also it just doesn't work at all in some situations. What is the balanced middle ground of:
Marginalized Group: "We deserve rights!"
Group in Power: "Nah, Things are better for me if they don't have rights."
"You can have a little rights, as a treat."
 

« first day (3933 days earlier)      last day (1087 days later) »