« first day (3902 days earlier)      last day (968 days later) » 

5:58 AM
@HannahVernon My all time favourite seen in Access. Was a pain to convert to a SQL Server database, because the developer didn't have any time to rewrite everything: tblSupplierInformation (This table is used to insert everything we know about our suppliers. Don't insert anything customer related)
 
Wow cool table name lol. So easy to type!
 
6:19 AM
Yes, indeed. That's when you start appreciating Red-Gate's SQL Prompt or Softtreetech's SQL Assistant.
Morning
btw
 
7:17 AM
Morning
 
@HannahVernon smells like a powershell problem
could be any number of things i reckon but, just as a POC...
 
Open sourcing the .NET 5 C# Language Extension for SQL Server
2
 
🎉
@HannahVernon db<>fiddle betrays you :p
@PeterVandivier and not to get too "who's on first" about it, but just for posterity:
 
@PeterVandivier it seems pointless... ;)
 
7:37 AM
> “King of Kings Ozymandias am I. If any want to know how great I am and where I lie, let him outdo me in my work.”
 
7:55 AM
was more shooting for the "vast and trunkless legs of stone" vibe, but yea :p
> think you can quote with a response but need a newline? 🤔
yup
 
I pressed Ctrl+K and I messed it up
Yep, I requires a new line
 
well then you deserve the shame of having done so on the permanent record of the transcript
😜
 
Set in stone!
 
Vast and Trunkless.
 
8:40 AM
@McNets chisels stone
 
9:08 AM
@PaulWhite 👍 Paul, The Sculptor.
 
 
4 hours later…
1:08 PM
does anyone know what the syntax is called when - in postgres - you prefix a string with b or x to cast it to bit e.g.
was trying to formulate a question where i want to use that syntax against text data from an expression rather than a string literal and i couldn't get it to work on db<>fiddle :(
now without knowing the name of what i'm trying (cast to bit/binary/etc all have much higher hit-rate questions/blog posts/etc), i'm sort of not sure how to proceed
 
Sep 1 at 20:00, by Hannah Vernon
user image
 
^^^ that's what the output looks like in SSMS
morning, btw
 
yea, i figured. just meant that dbfiddle removes the fun of the prank
 
it sure does
 
1:13 PM
and a fine morning to you too fellow unordered tuple
 
LOL who you calling unordered
 
disordered?
 
I prefer chaotic
 
plasmoid
 
SELECT HannahVernon WITH (NOLOCK)
@PeterVandivier now you're leaning towards calling me gaseous
 
1:15 PM
:p
 
did you see the trailer for The Matrix Resurrections?
 
ooooooh eeeemmmmm geeeee
yaaaaaassss
 
it sure looks sweet
 
i may have been slightly tipsy when i watched it
 
and it comes out on my birthday which is like my own special present
 
1:18 PM
gonna go see if it holds up under the weight of sobreity
brb
 
@PeterVandivier "may"
 
my BAC is eventually consistent, so there's really no way to be sure
 
"After all these years, to be going back to the Matrix!"
 
It's amazing how full of allegory that series of movies really is.
 
1:23 PM
i have absolutely no business being so hyped for this move
 
@PeterVandivier yah, I was blown away when I watched it.
I only hope it lives up to the hype
 
a dangerous hope
 
yah, what's that they say about high expectations?
 
i'm sure at very worst it'll be acceptable
as long as i like it better that 2 or 3 i'll be happy
 
for sure
103 days to go lol
 
1:29 PM
@PeterVandivier I don't think there is a specific name for that.
It's a prefix to distinguish between strings and bit-strings.
> There are three kinds of implicitly-typed constants in PostgreSQL: strings, bit strings, and numbers. ...
 
that's actually super helpful. bit-string is useful as a keyword for search on the problem
lol, yea. just knowing that keyphrase gave me the solution i needed on the first hit of the next search :p
1
Q: Postgres SQL read binary value from string field?

user802599I have a column in a Postgres database that is of type varchar but has a binary value stored in it. How can I return the binary value of the column in a way I can read it? For example, at the moment I see "r" in the column, I want to see the 1's and 0's that make up the value for r. To be a b...

ty!
fwiw - i just needed to cast with ::bit(n) rather than the leading-"b" notation
 
what were you trying to do?
 
1:44 PM
i'm creating a bitmap of column-level differences between table_from_backups and table_in_production. it's wide and not very human readable but there's not a lot of diversity in difference patterns, so i'm converting it to integer so people can more easily ID difference types 411, 145, and 161 when they see them repeated where they might glaze over reading 110011011, 010010001, and 010100001
it's actually something i've done before when running benchmarks with a lot of variables. you create a self-describing bitmap for every test profile then when you're down to just a few test profiles left to compare, you've got friendly numbers to refer to that tie back to when you're reading docs from the start of testing
 
2:11 PM
from my wife just now 🤣
 
@PeterVandivier You missed to anonymize one name at top of the second screen
 
nope, that's my wife ;p
it's her W, no need to hide
 
@PeterVandivier fine (I guessed it...) 👍
 
2:41 PM
@PeterVandivier reading comprehension is hard
 
3:20 PM
@PeterVandivier trolling the trollers? ;)
 
Lol is that even trolling?
 
4:01 PM
maybe I read it wrong. Is that two conversations or one?
oh, looks like one, after the 3rd reading (I blame Friday ;)
 
 
2 hours later…
5:39 PM
Regarding matrix resurrections --- at what point will people realize they're just making the same movies over and over again
I mean I sort of put up with it with star wars, but come on now
 
Idk, ask the Architect 😜
3
 
heh
that would make more sense if we didn't remember the earlier iterations
perhaps there will be a courtesy memory-wipe at the cinema entrance
 
I wonder if StackExchange will respect my right, as a Texan, not to get banned because I wish my name to be Israel is an Apartheid State.
 
5:56 PM
dunno --- is SE a social media site governed by the laws of TX?
 
6:22 PM
@PaulWhite I'm watching all three again, in UHD just to be sure.
 
@HannahVernon I did that a few years ago. They stand up really well I think.
I don't know if they'll benefit from 4K or not.
Sometimes the extra detail exposes flaws one would rather not know about.
I kinda hoped they'd do something a bit more ambitious (and risky) for IV
 
 
3 hours later…
9:08 PM
SET risky != profitable;
 

« first day (3902 days earlier)      last day (968 days later) »