« first day (2626 days earlier)      last day (2259 days later) » 

10:11 AM
@TomK. Automated Web App Scanners are useful in their place but have a number of problems, like false positives and also the very very large number of requests they send to get a result. There's a place for them (if well managed) but I've got to say, most web application security testers I know do not use automated scanners as part of their work
 
@RоryMcCune to be fair I was including things like fuzzers and some of the burp functionality under "scanners"
 
10:29 AM
ahh yeah I was thinking of automated scanners (acunetix, appscan, webinspect etc)
I have heard acunetix referred to as crashunetix
 
@RоryMcCune yeah, that was the intended direction of my question
and I think acunetix is the tool my company intends to purchase
 
well my recommendation would be to look at it in a dev/test environment in the first instance
make sure you're happy with the level of load
 
unfortunately i'm not directly involved in that decision (and it's already been made)
I will be involved if problems arise though ;)
 
well 2 things to watch, one is general load on the app (10,000's of requests quite quickly) and the other is, if you give it credentials to log in, it will (by default) try to fuzz every single parameter and form, so if you have any destructive functionality, that can end poorly
TBF in a well secured robust site it shouldn't cause too much trouble
 
10:46 AM
well, all our apps are deployed on a productive, test and reference environment
so testing can be done in rather safe environments
load isn't that big of a deal there
and regarding "destructive potential" that probably depends on the app. but it's good to be reminded that the tests can be more "powerful" - if you will - than manual testing
 
11:13 AM
@RоryMcCune I had one example like that - the page had a payment setup and the fuzzer completed the payment. It wasn't the expected test payment of £1. It was a few thousand...
 
11:33 AM
Yeah things like that or the web spider that deleted a customer database 'cause there was a GET request for "delete record" are my favs :)
 
to bring up something completely different: @AviD brought up a network of infosec people here. I'm relatively new in the field (6 months in) how do I get into one of these and is it even worth it at this point?
<3 bobby tables
 
hmm?
 
11:57 AM
if this isn't something that is accessible for people that are too uneperienced, it's no problem. no hard feelings
 
12:15 PM
not sure what you're referring to?
and everything should be accessible for everybody, we were all inexperienced at some point :-)
 
@TomK. I think its literally "I know some people who know some people..."
 
except for @RoryAlsop, the universe created him that way :D
 
@AviD In the beginning, there was Rory. And there was bugger all to do, so everyone went off and got sodding drunk?
 
lol
 
ugh.. linked to the wrong comment
I meant this one
 
12:19 PM
Ohh LinkedIn, the network of people that I know... @RoryAlsop also mentioned as much in his post.
OWASP on the other hand - there is an open Slack for that, if you are in appsec
 
aaah...
 
(well and even if you're not)
 
not really, I'm more on the conceptual side
you know, standards and norms and stuff like that
 
but why not
 
12:20 PM
lol
 
12:39 PM
alrighty, thanks for the invite
 
 
2 hours later…
2:17 PM
@TomK. LinkedIn is very useful - but generally people will only accept a connection once you have met them. OWASP, ISACA, IISP, etc are useful networking opportunities, both in person and via mailing lists
 
2:51 PM
yeah, I was thinking about joining ISACA, just didn't get around to it
thing is: none of my colleagues are members in any of these networks or associations
 
@TomK. I always encourage people newly into the industry to join at least one - it rapidly speeds up getting awareness and involvement in interesting things
and can be very helpful to your career
 
yeah, maybe that came out wrong. It's not that I'm not interested, it's just that my (maybe not so up-to-date) colleagues didn't give my any good pointers so far
 
@TomK. where are you based?
 
berlin, germany
but my company is very old-fashioned. not one of the hip start ups
(just checking out the german chapter of isaca)
 
I think ISACA in Germany is more Frankfurt based
I have been over there for a few events, but the ISACA ones were Munich and Frankfurt, mostly
 
3:03 PM
yeah, a lot of the recent and upcoming ones are as well
 
3:18 PM
Security of Things World - June 19
maybe that was last year - hang on
 
it's this year again ;) July 1 – 3, 2018
 
3:35 PM
well, thanks anyway. I'll keep my eyes open. if you have any more suggestions, I would be more than happy to hear them. my professional environment seems not to eager to foster my development
 
 
1 hour later…
4:49 PM
@RoryAlsop I do not know how "featured post" work exactly, but the only "featured on meta" as of now is "Request for comment: Stack Overflow is hiring a Director of Information Security" on my side.
 
On meta.security.se or meta.se? They certainly show up on my sidebar
 
Yeah, I noticed it has a strange behaviour too
 
Ah - seems to depend on which machine I try it on. One gives just that job, the other gives all three...
 
Sometimes the CTFs posts show up, sometimes it doesn't, I guess there's a cache or something
 
Maybe it checks for screen real estate and prioritises the official one?
 
4:54 PM
Yeah, that was I thought too, that's why I didn't report it
Maybe it's related to posts I've already read, but I've read all of them already
They're up again for me
 
Yup, just showed up for me too
 
Hmmmmm. Let's blame caching / glitch then
 

« first day (2626 days earlier)      last day (2259 days later) »