I'm personally of the opinion to have as much in one place as possible to stop having to go from question to question. Unless the answer to one of my sub-questions is exceptionally detailed
@AJHenderson link please (I think I know what you're talking about but I'm not sure... Oz people have been known to cause a stir more often than one can follow LOL)
@AJHenderson current month is so far younger than current week is :))
I've found that walking past certain boutique stores in my city that some places have installed very loud high-frequency noise generators. These cause a fair amount of discomfort for passers by that are able to hear them.
My understanding is that younger people are able to hear these frequencies ...
These devices you describe are also known as teen-repellents and take advantage of a well know fact that our hearing frequency range deteriorates with age, while it's not yet fully developed in pre-teen age. The most effective age range such devices could target is somewhere in the range of 12 to...
@D3C4FF don't yet... don't tick it green yet it might deter other answers and I'd be interested to hear from others too if they have something... I need dirt on these bloody buzzers
@MMavipc good thanks :) have you worked on any CTFs these days? I have still that RE chat you had with @D3C4FF to digest one day, maybe during weekend... you know, time is in short supply ;)
Hey guys. I had a question in my mind but I feel it wont be appropriate to ask this on the main site. WiFi networks have been around since the beginning of 90s and the first wireless security standard WEP came to existence in 1999. so I wonder what were we doing for the time period before WEP. I was a kid back then ;)
I wanted to know if security was an afterthought in case of WiFi?
@MayankSharma whilst I'm not directly indicating that he's old, the guy you want for that question is @RoryAlsop as he worked on wireless stuff back then...
@RoryMcCune Since it causes me discomfort (and potentially damages my hearing) while applying energy to me (in the form of sound) i think it legally applies
We've been hit by another one of those pesky spam messages posted as an answer today. I won't post a link as it wouldn't make much sense, considering it ought to be deleted any minute now, but I was wondering what is the advised way of handling such occurrences for us non-moderators?
What I did ...
Posted a q on meta to see what's the official word on how we should handle this
Additionally, does the community have any way of automatically removing/detecting spammy messages after (like in today's case) 5 posts quickly appear with the same link and get massively downvoted? — D3C4FF42 secs ago
@D3C4FF yup this too... I'm not gonna edit it in, I think it's a given that anyone that'll read it and can answer will read all of it
Here's the part from the relevant Meta.SO answer
What is the effect of the Spam flag?
This type of flag receives an extremely high priority in the moderation queue. It should be used only when the content of the post you are flagging meets the criteria defined below, or it will likely be declin...
Regarding your dad's iPhone, there's nothing to worry about. This is just an automated attack against Wafer GSM-AUTO (SMS-capable) devices.
The Wafer GSM-AUTO is a very simple Microcontroller. You can think of it as a remote power switch. It control anything from a security door switch to a norm...
Re spam:I think everything did the right thing re that spammer - and similarly if we get spam/vandal revisions just flag them. They get auto blocked etc, and mods see them soon enough and can destroy the user account if needed.
I'm really getting to like all this security stuff. I may even delve deeper into crypto later (right now I just know how RSA works, and I've tried to understand ECDSA)
@D3C4FF - that question was flagged up as off topic. Personally I think it is a fine question, but the piece regarding who makes them is both time localised and not a security question - so I thought taking that out was sufficient to remove the off topic flag.
@ManishEarth Currently, I just have my foot on the door of Cryptography. With time, I'll learn a bit more. I don't think that at anytime I'll attempt to be an expert in Cryptography, I don't think I'm cut for it.
Great! Now after I removed my previous proxy-related answer and posted a new one, it just appears as if everybody added "web proxies" to their questions and I copied it from them and put it as a new answer.
You do realise this will force me to post a load of links offering obvious startup advice (working 24-7 will kill you! If only I knew this before!) and about how node.js is solving all third world problems? Look what you've done to my day!
I've kinda accumulated half of the parts required anyway, so i figure i may as well drop the extra 1k for the other half of the components and get a good rig running
@AntonyVennard Yeah, mostly for VM's and picture editing
@D3C4FF Well, I always work on the basis of "don't waste the money because you want it". Like, I'd quite like something super powerful, but what I have is adequate. However, when you need it, because the alternative is actually causing you to e.g. waste time, then that becomes more justified.
@AntonyVennard Good logic. I also don't want to waste parts. I remembered i still had a spare 1000W PSU and i've got ~5TB of spare SATA drives kicking about as well, dusted off an old Antec sonata case, a DVD drive....
so i just need the board, C/GPU and RAM and i should be sweet
@RoryAlsop yeah it is more than a bit ironic there. but it just goes to show the disparity between what high risk companies are doing compared to what they should be doing.. Hard to see what'll change that game if QinetiQ are still in business and selling ok after that level of hacking..
The fact that they knew they had an issue but didn't close off their network, despite having data on the newest highly sensitive technological warfare improvements, is baffling!
@AntonyVennard indeed but that's scary on two fronts. One it implies that no-one cares (and surely they should) and/or the people that are in the market know that all the other companies are just as bad...
@AntonyVennard well yeah. Weirdly the only good answer is a really bad one, which is legislation mandating minimum security levels with harsh penalties for non-compliance
@RoryMcCune the other side of things is that QQ are in a fairly unique position, especially in the UK, of being the other half of the DERA, and therefore mostly-but-not-government. There basically is nobody else that does what they do in this country - or, if there is, the list is very small: BAE, Lockheed etc.
Actually, the industry is currently getting smaller. Detica, who do "government cyber" was brought out by BAE. Goodrich were bought out, and the likes of Logica etc who do miscellaneous large government contracts are now owned by not-themselves and so on.
I'm currently researching a novel that has a crime element that centres around Internet-exclusive relationships and I would appreciate any help you might be able to offer regarding how much access the UK police have to ISP logs (and any other relevant Internet-based information)—and what this inf...
According to my [trustworthy Euphemism Generator](http://walkingdead.net/perl/euphemism) , "I couldn't believe my luck as she started flicking the melting stainless steel emperor."
I had read through several research papers that showed existing researchers were widely discussed about existing automation scanners are tending to produce false positive results. In the meanwhile, I also did read through some articles that showing the manual penetration testing could be solution...
@TerryChia Not saying it's not worthy of an upvote in its current state, but I'd like to see you mention the downsides of false positives on the pen. testing procedure, as the OP mentioned something similar.