There have been several suggestions that skype is indeed backdoored and evesdroppable. If your concerned about it because Microsoft is now the owner, there are plenty of other alternatives to Skype which I would suggest as the easiest and cleanest solution (besides, if MS is your competitor, why ...
> As of this moment I officially resign from my job as software engineer and will take up work on the farm shovelling pig shit, and administering anal suppositories to sick horses because that will be a thousand times more tolerable than being in the same industry as dipshits like you.
> You read the latest post on highscalability.com and think you're a fucking Google architect and parrot slogans like 'web scale' and 'sharding', but you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.
> You're going to blow some project to hell because you get a woody playing with software like it's a sexdoll.
3
@LucasKauffman yes, we were all teenagers once...
@LucasKauffman I gave a lightning talk / rump talk at an OWASP conference a few years ago. It was supposed to be 5 minutes, at the conference they told us we can use 10 minutes, decided to go a bit slower and did it in 7.
see, 5 minutes wasnt enough of a challenge. So I decided to do the talk together with my boss - two people, 5 minutes, one awesome talk.
Now that's Extreme Rumping.
Actually one of the talks I most enjoyed giving. We had fun with it.
I would agree with the @RoryMcCune and @ThomasPornin - don't put a lot of words if you want them to read it.
you could try having a few words on a slide. Not even a sentence, just a thoughtshard. Make sure its huge font.
Or, fill it with lots and lots of tiny font, making it obvious they are not intended to read it - and prevent them from doing so.
Blurring the text works good too... Sometimes this is good to give a general idea of the amount of whatever the text is describing.
I am overclocking my Core i7 (Ivy Bridge 3770K), aiming for a moderate overclock.
Currently I have it easily stable at a pleasant 4.4GHZ - BCLK defaulted at 100.00MHz, with the multiplier set to x44.
While it is currently stable (tested using Prime95 torture test for a few hours), it does gen...
@D3C4FF fair enough, but according to @David, undervolting the PLL means you can get stable clocks with lower Vcore. which is cool.
I've actually found a small correlation between them - the x43 anomaly has me raising the Vcore (compared to x44), unless I lower the PLL too, beyond what is stable at x44.
Recently I was writing a business-language report about MD5. In my search a found a paper by Yu Sasaki and Kazumaro Aoki explaining their 2123.4 pre-image attack on MD5.
I know that it has something with the feasibility (or in some cases, even the possibility) of an attack, but I don't have a so...
ok so I just read the haystack thing, what a noob.
wow the more i read the worse it gets
Take, for example, the very weak password “news.” If another lowercase character was added to it (for example to form “newsy”), the total password search space is increased by 26 times. But if, instead, an exclamation point was added, (making it “news!”), the total search space is increased by a whopping 1,530 times!
The problem with the password padding idea is that it only marginally increases entropy. The padding is almost certainly going to be repetitive and human-chosen. I reckon you have two additional entropy values: the pattern (~ 6 - 12 bits) and the length ( maybe 5 bits, probably 3).
@TerryChia correct, it assumes we can absorb all of the suns energy for 32 years with no loss (impossible), and run a machine that requires the minimum possible energy to change state (impossible), we could cycle through 2^192 states.
note: this does not even begin to mention doing anything in each of those states, so there is no crypto or mathematics here yet.
The advice also seems to be choosing an extremely simple base word as an example (D0g) on the assumption that the padding makes this irrelevant. It also seems to be advising to use either the same base word or the same padding (or both) everywhere.
"Oscar, an opponent, similar to Mallet/Mallory but not necessarily malicious. Could be white-hat but still wants to crack, modify, substitute, or replay messages." according to Wikipedia
@ScottPack 24-25°C here so much the same ... not uncomfortable tho I've just came from the nearby hill ... it's tolerable in the shadow
@AviD why is the answer that completely misses the point and the rest is quotes from online documentation higher rated than the real answer from David?
@TerryChia The alternative is locking a real cryptographer in my basement ;)
@TildalWave Because people don't actually read the question/answer. They upvote answers that look good. Quoting the spec is always worth a few upvotes.
@AviD Maybe, but I'm not interested in what's a good answer for SU, and I doubt you are either. David's answer is actually a lot more in line with what I'd expect to be a highest rated answer for the question asked. It explains the logic behind it (supported by facts) and gives recommendations what to look for.
The short answer is this: Signal integrity is hard, and the rule of thumb higher frequency should require higher voltage is not the whole picture.
There are lots of factors that go into high-frequency signal integrity and without looking at the actual failures at an electrical level, it can be v...
Now this one, I've upvoted for pointing out some things, but it's not that useful at all IMO (save for a few links)
When I said some I meant a couple in this case
I actually expected at least one answer from an experienced OC-er that would include a table of values or two and base his/her answer on personal experience... there's a huge gap between OC theory and OC reality IMHO
@ScottPack 24-26 for me... but that's the perceived temperature, the real one might be different (pressure, relative humidity,...)
I mean my ideal temperature is when it feels like 24-26°C
@ScottPack well Haggis is a savoury pudding containing sheep's pluck (heart, liver and lungs); minced with onion, oatmeal, suet, spices, and salt, mixed with stock, and traditionally encased in the animal's stomach and simmered for approximately three hours and sausage isn't :)
@RoryMcCune we have something similar here, well actually two things... one is closer to black pudding, and the other is what we call the stomach because the stomach it's packed in actually gives it a distinct flavour (some love it, some hate it)
@AviD Let's just say I'm still not convinced the closure was justified... actually less so than when it was closed
well, out of the 1 q's I've asked over the last few days, I feel David's answer to the PLL q was as good as I could get. Made me comfortable using SU for this...
You can't have one topic being tossed around from one site to another and then call either of the two (or more?) sites as sufficient for the discussed topic
@AviD you mean there's one member that gives satisfactory answers... whose efforts might be better recognizable on a separate site? what I want to say is that you can interpret that either way and while I have a tiny proof more that the OC subsite is needed, I don't have not a hint more of the opposite than when we started this discussion
@TildalWave @AviD I agree, i think that the Overclock site would get considerably more 'momentum' behind questions if asked in a dedicated forum. It doesn't seem to 'be their thing'
@AviD I guess what I'm trying to say is that the suggestion we got on the close question might not be as great as I also thought it was. Who's to say that these very same people that give good answers to such questions on SU wouldn't give even better ones on OC? Shouldn't we then ask them as well? How to do that?
@AviD I think it's more to it than just receiving answers and then those questions and answers having votes on them. That's what's been suggested, but now I doubt that's a good indication for whether a new subsite is in order or not.
We have no way of measuring quality and social impact of a non existing site, do we?
@AviD those for the closure can always say but it was sufficiently answered on SU, based on our criteria for new sites. And we could say but SU isn't a new site, so shouldn't it have different success criteria?
@AviD This should is what's bothering me. And the politics involved. I'm fine with policy, but not with politics. We have the latter, but not a clearly defined former.
@AviD And it will be, until the site is up and running. My pride wouldn't suffer if it turns out to not be needed (so we gave it a try...), but this subjectivism and openness to personal interpretation IS a pain in the butt (why do anything, let's talk more...).
@RoryMcCune Sausage is the ground remains of leftover organs, scrap meat, and blood spiced with salt and herbs and stuffed into an intestine of stomach.
Strictly speaking I would consider haggis a specific form of the classification sausage.
As a starting point, we will consider that each elementary operation implies a minimal expense of energy; Laundauer's principle sets that limit at 0.0178 eV, which is 2.85*10-21 J. On the other hand, the total mass of the Solar system, if converted in its entirety to energy, would yield about 1.8...
@D3C4FF It's a brand of toys for young children; very similar in design to the Windows XP default theme (or maybe that's the other way round).
@RoryMcCune I have a recurring meeting that's every two weeks on a Thursday, today being one of the days. I would like to reschedule it to be next Thursday, and every 2 weeks thereater.
My fallback is to change the end date to the last instance, and create a new meeting.
I presume that if I change the start date it will retroactively screw up the calendar?
@ScottPack hmmm this used to be easy enough on the old versions (previous millenium when I last used it), just a calendar change and send updates IIRC, not at all sure how that is now tho
@ScottPack ahh sorry don't know that one, but your fallback sounds plausible, and could be a better option as I'd have thought that even if the change works it might send out a load of re-schedule meeting invites...
@ScottPack I always tend to caveat very heavily when it's not something I've done myself and I don't know the precise system config :). She's off nexii these days anyway it's surfaces all the way (luckily for our bank balance she's not taken to handing those out much!)
@RoryMcCune Dagnabbit! Also yes. If my statement is not couched enough to make you feel skeezy then I'm not doing my job.
@RoryMcCune But yeah, what makes me nervous is the fact that I'm not changing times or days or anything, just which weeks it happens. Say what you will about Oracle/Corporate Time but previous calendar events were pretty well immutable.
@RoryMcCune Well, I can't seem to figure out any way to make it work. Changing the start time to next week kills all previous events. There doesn't seem to be a "rechedule" option except for just editing and changing the times. So either it can't reasonably be done, or the option doesn't exist in the Mac version of Outlook.
It's always bothered me that many PHP programs require the user to store the mysql password in plain text (in a string or constant) in a configuration file in the application's root.
Is there any better approach to this after all these years?
So far I have come up with two minimal security boos...
@Polynomial I wanted to say, that's more west than north, but for the life of me I cannot recall the name of the neighborhood that I was based in, when I would pop into London every few weeks...
@Polynomial almost spooky how damn many of that exact question there are.
@Adnan really? I've answered here, there are 2 ways.
#1 - dont keep a password at all. #2 - encrypt it, and have the OS protect the encryption key.
@Polynomial north, I think it was the black underground line. east of golders green and a bit north (I know, because I've had to travel there to get kosher food :-) )