« first day (1157 days earlier)      last day (3441 days later) » 

8:19 AM
@JackDouglas Might that word be "anachronism"?
 
@Davïd This was one of my favorite comments on the topic.
@PaulVargas I agree that it seems to be on topic. I didn't much care for it either, but I couldn't quite pinpoint why. Maybe Jack/David have said it.
 
8:46 AM
@Davïd If you have this in hand, could you give me the page numbers for the chapter covering 19? I can't find the table of contents previewed, but I can request a copy of the entire chapter if I have the page numbers.
The other citation you gave me is only in German, correct? (I don't read German....)
 
9:12 AM
0
Q: Why the close parallels between the story of Elijah raising the widow’s son, in 1 Kings 17:10-24, and Jesus raising the widow’s son in Luke 7:11-16?

Dick Harfield Both stories mention the “city gate” (1 Kings 17:10; Luke 7:12) Both stories concern raising the dead son of a widow (1 Kings 17:10,21-2; Luke 7:12) Both stories use the same introductory phrase, “And it came to pass” (1 Kings 17:17; Luke 7:11) Both stories use the phrase,“de...

«Continuity between the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament is an assumption and should be explicitly stated as such (and in the case of questions about the Hebrew Bible with no mention of New Testament texts, it's relevance will likely also need to be defended). There are of course exceptions, such as when a New Testament text itself cites the Hebrew Bible.» See more...Paul Vargas 5 hours ago
It would be nice if this question were drawn out a little more, but I'm not sure I think the fact that it includes both testaments is a problem.
Would it be better if it asked "Did Luke intend to draw a parallel between these stories?" and if so, "What point did Luke intend to convey by the parallel?"
 
9:40 AM
@Susan Clines covers Job 19 on pages 426-470. It's a fairly detailed treatment. :) He also offers a specialist bibliography of vv. 25-27 in pp. 426-7 where the Speer article (the one linked auf Deutsch) is one among ~28 or so items.
@Susan Before you go through the trouble to get it, though, you might see if his article on Job 19:23-27 available on Academia.edu gives you what you're looking for.
It's a fairly short piece, though. Original source: D. J. A. Clines, "Belief, Desire and Wish in Job 19:23–27: Clues for the Identity of Job's 'Redeemer,'" in "Wünschet Jerusalem Frieden": Collected Communications to the XIIth Congress of the International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament, Jerusalem 1986 (ed. Matthias Augustin and Klaus-Dietrich Schunck, BEATAJ; Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang, 1988), 363-69.
You might also be able to grab this more recent article on the verses.
@Susan Agreed!
 
@Davïd Thanks, will have a look through all that. Requesting that somebody else scan a bunch of pages and email them to me turns out to be pretty cheap for me, so I'll do that too.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:50 AM
@Davïd It appears that you created the current wiki. Do you have any objection to me changing it to DO NOT USE THIS TAG for the reasons outlined here?
If you have other thoughts about how we could productively use this tag rather than stripping it as Jack and I discussed, I'm open to changing my mind.
 
12:47 PM
@Davïd Yes! Thanks :)
 
 
2 hours later…
3:11 PM
@Susan No objections at all. I was on a bit of a campaign to ... ahhh ... enhance the information (and consistency) of the tag-wikis. But there are some tags I wish we could simply be rid of, and you made a great point about the inherent problem with this one in particular.
 
@Davïd Just asked on meta so others can weigh in.
@Davïd And thank you in general for improving the tag wikis. I encourage others to read them but have not often paid attention myself.
 
0
Q: Can I get rid of the exegesis tag?

SusanThis problem was predicted in the early days of the site and dealt with a few years ago but has come up again. There are only 30 questions now tagged exegesis, an apparently random bunch among the many exegesis questions here. The inconsistency irritates me. All of the 30 (except one that was mig...

 
3:30 PM
@Susan Have recorded my vote + comment. :)
 
 
2 hours later…
5:34 PM
1157
Biblical Hermeneuticshermeneutics.stackexchange.com

Beta Q&A site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts.

Currently in public beta.

▲ We need more questions.
 
@JackDouglas And done.
0
A: What historical reasons resulted in Revelation being included in most Christian canons?

Frank LukeAs a prior answer has examined where Enoch failed in canonicity, this one shall turn to the Book of Revelation to determine what factors led the church to recognize its canonicity. Though a popular genre, few apocalyptic works found their way into the New Testament canon. The most obvious excep...

Please let me know if anything reads funny. The comb wasn't as fine-toothed as others.
 
6:14 PM
@FrankLuke +1 Very good answer.
 
6:48 PM
@FrankLuke It reads fine to me, thanks for the effort you put into it. I now have a 'go to' reference for Revelation's canonicity which is a great help :)
@PaulVargas not sure we do - questions per day has risen very slowly but also very steadily ever since the site started I think
We just need to keep the quality up, and the audience will keep growing
I was wondering about a meta-competition to encourage more answers to old Qs myself
I think it would be good to get our answer ratio up...
 
7:18 PM
@JackDouglas Perhaps @majnemɪzdæn would like to help us with a query to know that questions have few answers.
 
@JackDouglas Very glad to be of service.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:20 PM
@PaulVargas haha @JackDouglas is more of an expert than I in writing SQL queries, but I can of course help if needed ;)
 
10:17 PM
@majnemɪzdæn @JackDouglas Perhaps that query might be: SELECT TOP 100 CreationDate, Id AS [Post Link], AnswerCount FROM Posts WHERE AnswerCount < 3 ORDER BY Id. ;)
 

« first day (1157 days earlier)      last day (3441 days later) »