« first day (349 days earlier)      last day (4236 days later) » 

6:51 AM
You are yourself a source from my perspective - but for me to give credence to what you say requires me to decide whether you are a credible one. Saying something is "manifestly obvious" to you makes no difference - I already assume you believe what you say - but no-one else has any reason to unless you can back up what you assert in some other way than saying "I'm the only one with any intelligence/integrity, so there!" — Jack Douglas 1 min ago
Fair?
@Jon any reason why we can't let it run a few months?
 
7:15 AM
@JackDouglas More than fair.
 
 
8 hours later…
3:02 PM
@JackDouglas he's contradicting himself
 
3:45 PM
@JackDouglas No particular reason. (We instigated it.)
 
@JonEricson ok, well I'd like to plead for a bit more time at least :)
@swasheck in what way?
 
@JackDouglas he relies on a theory that was not generated by himself, yet he claims to do no such thing
 
@swasheck the Documentary Hypothesis? I think he would claim to have arrived at it independently :)
 
@JackDouglas we'll just have to see :)
 
4:15 PM
@JackDouglas I went ahead and removed and the deadline. We can bring it up again in a few more weeks.
 
@JonEricson thanks!
 
I'd also like to do another edition of the poll in a few more months.
The votes so far line up with my impressions.
@JackDouglas That's a good way of putting things, by the way.
 
 
5 hours later…
9:33 PM
@JonEricson Next time I'd try not posting your impressions until other people have made a stab at it. By all means weigh in, but get some poll data first.
 
9:51 PM
@Caleb Yeah. That's what I'm afraid of. :-(
I copied Shog's version a bit too much, I think.
 

« first day (349 days earlier)      last day (4236 days later) »