> I'm almost positive the failing line of code is this one: https://github.com/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/blob/next/Rubberduck.Core/Navigation/CodeExplorer/CodeExplorerItemViewModel.cs#L44
I suspect what is happening is that a `Declaration` is passing the equity test there that shouldn't be. That would prevent the node from being removed from the active tree, and since the context on the `Declaration` is the one that is being evaluated against the now current parse tree, the context search f
> Pretty self explanatory. We have the UI cultures hard coded in a lookup without a check, so if the xml file uses a culture that isn't available in RD, the binder fails and the settings form doesn't load.
Can be reproduced with a settings file containing something like `<Language Code="fu-br" />`
> Should have thought of it sooner - in SSMS, I quite like how they have those extra buttons: 
Though Windows messagebox are already copy-able, it makes for better discoverability and provide a way for linking documentation.
It was actually in my grandma's obituary. Something to the effect of "we fight within ourselves a lot, and we have our problems, but if you are in a fight, you want the Hosch's on your side."
My mom hates it, and my dad thinks it is weird.
But all my brothers laughed, and are proud to carry the spirit.
C# and VBA? Just what we need! Welcome to the pond!
This is where the Rubberduck VBA addin is designed, implemented, and discussed, along with various other coding elements, best practices, and random discussions.
Hey Hosch! I left the chat tab open and just got back on computer for a few minutes here right before bed.
Great to be here! Yes that's my core experience. A lot of data management and custom utility and reporting software. I have heard about this project many times over the years and just never got around to plugging in. I'd love to get familiar with the project and see what I can contribute when I have time.
> This might already be known but I could not find how to search known bugs:
When I try to rename standard module "Z-ObjectFactory" to "Z-Object-Factory" (or the other way around) the ok button in the rename-dialog is not shown.
Its seems like rubberduck dont want me to use "-" in any module name while ms-access has no problem with this.
A good starting point might be the issue list on the github repo.
We try to categorize the issues based on how much knowledge about Rubberduck`s internals are required. However, that is a rough guess from people working on the project for some time. Do, take it with a grain of salt.
We also have some references in ge wiki on the repo regarding some parts of how RD works, but I doubt that everything is up to date.
Oh, and if you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask here in chat.
Hope to see you around in this chat in the future.
i want to scrape pages from 1 to 25 pages:
Pls find my code below it show error subscription out of range.
pls help me.
Sub freshersworld()
Dim r As Long
Dim ie As InternetExplorer
Dim doc As HTMLDocument
Dim output As Variant
Set ie = New InternetExplorer
...
> This is a standard module which I usually dont want to use the module name anyway.
And this is often not a matter of choice. If there are tons of legacy code which work with exactly this naming convention then Its not as easy to change.
Anyway: Rubberduck should not try to force me to do things just because it thinks its better for me.
> This is a standard module so I usually dont want to use the module name anyway.
And this is often not a matter of choice. If there are tons of legacy code which work with exactly this naming convention then Its not as easy to change.
Anyway: Rubberduck should not try to force me to do things just because it thinks its better for me.
> This is a standard module so I usually dont want to use the module name anyway.
And this is often not a matter of choice. If there are tons of legacy code which work with exactly this naming convention then its not as easy to change.
Anyway: Rubberduck should not try to force me to do things just because it thinks its better for me.
> This is a standard module so I usually dont want to use the module name anyway. I use "x()"...
And this is often not a matter of choice. If there are tons of legacy code which work with exactly this naming convention then its not as easy to change.
Anyway: Rubberduck should not try to force me to do things just because it thinks its better for me.
The line `!NewName.Any(c => !char.IsLetterOrDigit(c) && c != '_')` is a bit too restrictive.
We most likely need a separate property `IsRestrictedName` which will then present the user with a yellow exclamation icon instead of red cross icon and thus bring the attention
@MarkBalhoff hi! welcome to our little corner of the Internet! There are countless ways you can contribute to the project! Step 1 would be to fork the project on GitHub (and "star" us too, if you haven't already!) Are you familiar with git & GitHub, OOP and DI/IoC? If not don't worry, this chat is the perfect place to ask anything about it! There are a number of inspections that are fun and fairly easy to implement, like #4522.
> I think what we actually need is a different validation for modules and maybe projects. For declarations defined in the code, the restriction is completely valid.
> Implementations MUST support <Latin-identifier>. Implementations MAY support one or more of the other identifier forms and if so MAY restrict the combined use of such identifier forms.
> This is host specific. From **3.3.5 Identifier Tokens**:
> Implementations MUST support <Latin-identifier>. Implementations MAY support one or more of > the other identifier forms and if so MAY restrict the combined use of such identifier forms.
In Excel, identifiers containing `-` are restricted, so implementing this would require name validation for each VBA host. If this _is_ implemented, I'd propose adding a `NonPortableIdentifierInspection` that would flag uses of identifiers tha
> This is host specific. From **3.3.5 Identifier Tokens**:
> Implementations MUST support <Latin-identifier>. Implementations MAY support one or more of > the other identifier forms and if so MAY restrict the combined use of such identifier forms.
In Excel, identifiers containing `-` are illegal, so implementing this would require name validation for each VBA host. If this _is_ implemented, I'd propose adding a `NonPortableIdentifierInspection` that would flag uses of identifiers that f
@Comintern reminds me of that old joke -- 3 men broke out of the prison on an island in the dark of night. First swam 2 miles but drowned because the water was too cold. Second went out 4 miles and drowned. The third swam 8 miles, said to himself, it's too cold, and swims back. The island was 10 miles from the mainland.
> This is host specific. From **3.3.5 Identifier Tokens**:
> Implementations MUST support <Latin-identifier>. Implementations MAY support one or more of > the other identifier forms and if so MAY restrict the combined use of such identifier forms.
In Excel, identifiers containing `-` are illegal, so implementing this would require name validation for each VBA host. If this _is_ implemented, I'd propose adding a `NonPortableIdentifierInspection` that would flag uses of identifiers tha
> Because it's host specific, and I really don't want to have to enumerate each host's specific extensions, I'm inclined to stick to a modified version of the original proposal - provide a yellow exclamation icon for any identifiers that bucks the absolute minimum as specified in 3.3.5 (which is any latin characters), along with a try/catch in applying the change with notifications to the user if the change is rejected by the host.
> I reclassified this because, first, it really requires to know how to handle the change in a lot of places in RD and, second, because this is not a bug but a know and at one point probably intentional quirk of the setup of the type enums in RD. (It also applies to user forms.)
That no test broke is not surprising since we generally do not add tests regarding document modules to test fixtures not explicitly sealing with host specific features.
Things are not that easy. E.g. the setup of a few methods on the declaration finder assumes that a declaration type used as a flag never gets used as actual declaration type on a declaration.
Hmm. If the quirk is in fact intentional, then it shouldn't be a flag after all. It also raises the question why the DeclarationType almost duplicates the ComponentType
@Comintern I know - that's why I said "almost" - I assumed originally that the point of DeclarationType was to tell me what type of declaration it is without having to dig up the underlying type via the ComponentType
@this the original design had everything as a Declaration, without an inheritance hierarchy; curing the DeclarationType enum involves revisiting Declaration... which means surgery in the core of the backbone =)
i want to scrape pages from 1 to 25 pages:
Pls find my code below it show error subscription out of range.
pls help me.
Sub freshersworld()
Dim r As Long
Dim ie As InternetExplorer
Dim doc As HTMLDocument
Dim output As Variant
Set ie = New InternetExplorer
...
VBA Rubberducking
VBA Rubberducking