RELOAD!

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 7 commits. 2 issue comments. 16034 additions. 10931 deletions.

BTW, @Kapol, don't worry if it takes a bit to get your first PR in. It's just that you haven't learned the VBE grammar as well or haven't had the years of experience with what the VBE does and doesn't like that most of us have (and we still have a ways to go here).

argh VTC - stackoverflow.com/questions/44751891/…

I doubt they understand GML or Matlab either, if they can't figure it out.

OK, @Mat'sMug, these are the issues I'm committing to as low-priority issues in my life (work, dog/school, RD, I guess):

1) Simple-ish, sort-of: Display difference between old and new code for inspections. Will be generic for use by the refactorings too, if anyone can figure out how to display such large changes cleanly.

2) Get more UI's onto the folder structure.

@Hosch250 what's left for high-priority?

@ThunderFrame Work and dog/school are higher.

@Hosch250 Oh, I misread - I thought you were saying they were all low priority

3) Make it so RD can run an add-ins grammar file and provide the resulting parse trees (probably as a dictionary<name, trees>) to the addin.

4) (possibly, not committing yet) Make an addin for XML doc comments.

Actually, 3 is pointless.

I just need to listen for RD's Parsing event and trigger my own parser.

Then I'll be able to somehow get the name of the identifier for the doc comment and query RD for the declaration info.

I wouldn't be able to integrate it directly into RD's parse tree anyway because it could conflict with existing nodes.

So basically, I'd need to steal some of the nodes from RD's grammar, but clean them up. Oh, and I might not have it free for any but the core RD team.

It would be cheap though, probably $10 for a lifetime license with all upgrades for that major version.

@ThunderFrame How did the presentation go?

I don't think I ever heard about the result. Were they interested?

@Hosch250 it was due to be start of July, but it got bumped to September.

Oh, so it hasn't happened?

Be sure and give a status update :)

@Hosch250 gtc.modeloff.com/sydney

GTG get ready for bed so I'm not tired for work tomorrow.

Which company are you going with?

I'm a contractor, so I'll be an Independent Consultant

Oh. Are you on this page? gtc.modeloff.com/presenters

nope - haven't presented there before, so those are some of last years presenters

OK. Here's hoping you are a better presenter than me. I don't like the limelight.

I like pulling the strings behind the scenes.

presenting is easy when you know the material

and difficult when you have people like me in the audience ;-)

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] avena starred us

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] rkapka commented on pull request #3069: Created RedundantByRefModifier inspection

> My comment was related only to the inspection itself. I wrote that it is not a problem to have ByRef only in the interface (you misread the sentence), because in this case an issue will be found and the fix will leave no explicit ByRef modifiers. In the opposite scenario there will be nothing to fix, because at the moment interface implementations are not treated as issues.

[rubberduck203/VBEX] maninweb starred us

@RubberDuck It might be worth cross-promoting RD on the VBEX README.md. I suspect new githubbers browse for VBA repositories, but miss out on RD because it shows up as C#.

I'll happily approve the PR @ThunderFrame.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] l1xnan starred us

@Mat'sMug You mean I missed 12,345? Damn.

@Mat'sMug Minor versions get approved quickly, it's 3.0 that I have to be worried about lol.

@ThunderFrame That's awesome. Congrats! Make sure you post a recording if there is one.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] joshuader6 commented on issue #3051: Code Inspections not showing anything.

@Hosch250 Quick Fix is what I'm working on. I don't know how well I understand it to completely finish it.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder added label critical to issue #3058: Parsing issue: Library not registered

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] Vogel612 commented on issue #3051: Code Inspections not showing anything.