11:31
@FlatterMann What on earth do you think I am claiming? Your response about perpetual motion make no sense at all. All I am talking about is the wave-only interpretation of quantum theory, and even there I am not making any claims, just asking about evidence.
@BillAlsept All I was saying is that there is no requirement for the fields to be made of anything, and that in any theory there will be fundamental elements that are not made of anything. Within the confines of QFT, the electron field is such a field. Whether this will be replaced by a later theory in which the electron is a composite field is unknown and not really something we can usefully speculate on here. I am not demanding that the electron field is fundamental just saying in QFT it is.
« first day (1 day earlier) last day (15 days later) »
Transcript for
Oct23
Oct '2225
Nov9
Discussion on question by Ponder Stib…
Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...