« first day (1876 days earlier)      last day (1624 days later) » 

@Derpy if I'm reading this right, this sounds like an attempted compliment no?
 
@Rubiksmoose that was why I asked, I can't discern if that is a compliment or mockery.
 
@Derpy It's honestly really hard to tell
It's more confusing than either, but if I had to guess, I would guess it was intended as a compliment ("page-turner" being rather positive in connotation)
 
I know. The fact that the comment ends with "..." doesn't help my understanding either. I guess I will just skip over it then.
 
yeah, it is very unclear to me as well.
@Akixkisu So I know this is very old at this point, but I am just now noticing it. Do you have any feedback for me about that comment in particular? The way you used it as an example implies (by my reading) that you see it as an example of a bad or negative comment, but I did not intend it that way. If so, what can I do to better make that clear?
(note: I think the broader context the point was made in was resolved so I'm just interesting in that comment)
 
7:56 AM
@Rubiksmoose I think you're interesting elsewhere too, but I assume you meant interested
 
@Someone_Evil darn! just a second too late lol
 
8:33 AM
@Rubiksmoose no, I don't think that it is negative. But I regard it as policing. Someone not calling that "policing" is what I would regard as dishonest - this kind of policing is endorsed and wanted.

Effectively it is what business do in their evaluations. We have a structure of competing answers that are rewarded with up-votes, punished with down-votes, and this feeds into basic desires of loss-aversion. Hm, this is a complex topic of remuneration systems that deal with worker happiness and competitive evaluation. Oversimplified: we compare our answers and if we place below-average our h
 
@Akixkisu huh, well I'm not sure I understand where the perspective on that being policing comes from necessarily though. I wasn't talking about rules at all in the comment was I?
It is possible we mean different things by the term.
But regardless I am pleased to hear that you didn't view it as a negative comment.
 
@Rubiksmoose You had the good intention of improving the answer, and the tool you employ is that given by this site - this is the policing in which we control our collaborative work. The policing is monitoring of quality content born from a shared-goal. Specific: Questions should be clear and understandable - therefore we comment, and this feedback that we get is part of the comparative evaluation (that we do ourselves).
We police each other everywhere with our guidelines/social contracts, norms and etiquettes - likewise policing is often a good thing regardless of the culturally negative connotation that the word may have.
 
8:52 AM
Indeed. I'm still not sure policing is the term I'd personally pick for this behavior, but I get what you are saying. Tone is important though, not just intent. If I had said "Fix your question or else I will vote to close it because I have no idea what you are talking about." that would have been out of line (IMO) despite going for the same goal.
 
I think that use of term is very useful, but it may be valuable to remember that it is not always used in that broad a sense. Most of the time it will refer more to enforcement of strict rules/stopping harmful behaviour, and using terms in a different sense than is common can easily lead to misunderstandings
Example: deleting a comment or chat message that is rude is policing, suggesting an improvement on a Q/A is not. (to most people)
 
9:06 AM
A gun is still a gun, whether handed smiling or not. The person who gets feedback is not coerced, but as the person shares the same goal, they will likely comply or get defensive about it.

Imagine your fly is open in public, you still feel embarrassed, even if someone helps you to fix it because you do not want to be the person whose fly is open in public. If you do not comply, you will be punished (with looks, stares, etc.). Some people decide not to tell someone that their fly is open in public because they know that the person who will receive the feedback will get embarrassed either wa
We monitor these things, and we have goals towards which we act. StackExchange is brim-full with self-moderation tools. But that is generally helpful.
 
Indeed. Well thank you for your feedback. I didn't intend to have this go down the road of competing definitions. I just wanted to make sure my meaning was clear there and if not, to learn from my mistake.
 
Sure I happen to enjoy that ;)
 
Oh me too, at times.
 
 
1 hour later…
10:28 AM
why do I have to keep working on business-oriented (sharepoint) apps and can't do something more useful for the world instead...
 
lol
 
@Derpy Some of those are terrifying. All of them are amazing
 
gah!
 
my brain can't even parse this one: d2ph5fj80uercy.cloudfront.net/03/cat6127.jpg
 
10:37 AM
I...can't even.
The green light in that picture is actually one of the more confusing parts of it.
Besides the obvious cat-like subject
 
the "deepfake" thing has become pretty viral at this point.
consider someone actually made this (and it is not even the only one, just one of the more known and better made)
https://make.girls.moe/

Anime (girl) faces generation.
 
I'm sure this says something about us as humans. I'm just not sure what.
 
@Rubiksmoose wonder if there is any game that actually tried to apply this to npc generation
 
@Derpy I wonder! It's darned good.
 
11:24 AM
@Rubiksmoose disclaimer... It is old. Very old.
But it is also very understandable by non-technical people.
This is a pretty good example about how a "very stupid" approach at creating an AI that plays a generic game could do wonders....
especially nice when the AI actually start using game bugs to progress and maximize scores.
 
11:41 AM
A very long time ago, before YouTube had monopolized content and people made .swf jokes as often as they made video jokes, somebody made the RPG NPC Simulator.
It was an old Flash interactive with a tired-looking guy sitting at a bar and a text input box. No matter what you typed in, the man would sigh deeply and say, "Times are tough."
He made it into several of my early campaigns.
 
@BESW see this ^
 
With "Drying Paint" expansion pack and "Growing Grass" spinoff?
 
probably, yep.
 
Not to be confused with the unrelated words-and-colors game "Pot and Kettle."
(It doesn't have a lot of replay value.)
 
I would love to say that is just something that no one will ever make.
Then I remember that the Desert Bus --VR-- remake actually not only got made... it managed to be on STEAM too.
 
12:08 PM
It could go into the Not a Game Jam Game Jam.
 
@BESW you... know this, right?
well, someone actually made it in a real game.
Just search for "Hell Tetris"
that said... It's a nice link you gave me, never heard of that before. Thanks
 
Some of the creators who contributed to it are amazingly talented and just blowing my mind with what they're doing with RPGs, especially in terms of decolonizing the medium.
 
just wondering... since I mentioned it before when we were talking about "cozy" games, did you ever happen to see a flash game called "Fisher Diver"?
 
Nope.
 
12:29 PM
yep, I guessed so. A pity in a way, but an expected one. It is nothing really complex, but it has an interesting ending.
not really related to "not-a-game" but still something people usually don't expect.
May 8 at 8:52, by Derpy
Is Fisher Diver cozy? After all, you are just fishing, apparently cannot even dye during the game (if you do, the day you died on is revealed to just be a nightmare) and you don't even have to fish if you don't want to....
May 8 at 8:53, by Derpy
Yep, there is that strange weird fact that the diary "pages" you keep finding are from a guy called Connell.....
 
@Derpy absolutely riveting 11/10
 
@trogdor it is an actual game made by a Deviantart user
 
wat
huh
people will make anything
 
@trogdor Look, will take any of these "non-games" over some of the games that real companies actually managed to release.
 
12:51 PM
@Derpy at least it's short and not offensive I guess
 
@trogdor the pot watcher thing?
 
yes
because of what you said above
there are some games that should never have been made
 
that was my point, yep.
 
I could even go so far as to say a lot of them
there are also quite a few that are legitimately games and some people enjoy but that I would rather spend a minute and 45 seconds playing pot watcher than play myself
so that's also fair enough
 
Look... you folks have an unwritten rule here about not mentioning a specific "tabletop rpg game", right?
 
12:57 PM
I wasn't even talking about RPG games
I was limiting myself to video games
but yeah there are a few of those that should never have been made
anyway I don't think you are unallowed to mention the game I think you mean but I think it would be best to let it die of not being known
 
well, let's just stop ourselves at saying that the videogame "game" I was thinking of and that I would not touch even with the Ruyi Jingu Bang is basically what I consider the equivalent of that tabletop one.
In case you don't know, Ruyi Jingu Bang is the original name of Son Goku / Sun Wukong staff. The one that could extend to arbitrary lengths.
 
I did not remember the name
I have read Journey to the West though
 
 
8 hours later…
9:02 PM
@Derpy I remember only because of RWBY
 

« first day (1876 days earlier)      last day (1624 days later) »