« first day (3288 days earlier)      last day (407 days later) » 

HNQ
1:23 AM
1
Q: Why does the focus point of the eye does not burn the retina

StefanHTo see an object, its light rays have to meet on the retina in the focal point. But the focal point is a small white dot. Basically nothing would be distinguishable and the retina would burn because all energy is concentrated at a single point? Obviously, this is not happening. But why?

 
 
3 hours later…
HNQ
4:25 AM
1
Q: On the (non)linearity of electromagnetism

m137As a student you are typically told that Maxwell's equations (ME) in vacuum are linear. However, it seems that for extremely high electromagnetic fields the equations for electromagnetism turn out to be nonlinear. I think examples are super-strong laser pulses (even if the precise mechanism is un...

 
 
3 hours later…
HNQ
7:52 AM
1
Q: Do we actually need negative probabilities in quantum mechanics?

Mikayla Eckel CifreseI was reading this thread and I'm a bit confused. The answer says negative probabilities can account for destructive wave interference and the events cancelling out. But if events just cancel out, shouldn't that make the probability zero? Why would it be negative? Additionally, my (possibly in...

 
 
9 hours later…
HNQ
4:55 PM
1
Q: Significant figures and angles

wosWe measure an angle to be -55 degrees (2 sigfigs). Let us take the sine of this angle. We get sin(-55) (2 sigfigs). Now, since sin(-55)=sin(305), then we can also take the sin(305) (3sigfigs). Now, since sine(305) is just sin(3905), then we can also take sin(3905) (4sigfigs) and so on. In this ma...

 
 
1 hour later…
HNQ
6:12 PM
2
Q: Does acceleration make you heavier?

ThomasI'm looking at this article from Scientific American: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/star-wars-science-light-speed/#:~:text=Normal%20humans%20can%20withstand%20no,heavier%20blood%20to%20the%20brain. The third paragraph states that: "When undergoing an acceleration of 9 g's, your body ...

 
 
5 hours later…
HNQ
11:22 PM
1
Q: Why should we expect motional emf to obey the same general relation as Faraday's Law?

Adam HerbstThere are many posts on this forum asking whether motional emf is actually an instance of Faraday's Law -- because, confusingly, it is often taught as though it is, with no qualification. The best answer I've seen so far is this really excellent one by @Timaeus. But I would like to go one step ...

 

« first day (3288 days earlier)      last day (407 days later) »