« first day (10 days earlier)      last day (742 days later) » 

3:46 AM
@MartinSleziak Accessing the article through JSTOR has the advantage of being a known legitimate source. There are some other sites that offer that article as a free download, but I'd guess they are not as stable as JSTOR over the next decade. Getting the JSTOR free account is an impediment, but on balance I see that as the lesser of evils. Sometimes an author hosts their paper on an academic site or personal site, and that could be a good alternative. But I didn't find it to the case here.
 
4:30 AM
@hardmath I'd guess the most optimal would be to have: full citation, DOI and JSTOR link. But I guess that would clash a bit with Noah Schweber's style of writing, such as:
> If $V=L$, we can talk about iterating the Turing jump past $\omega_1^{CK}$ via mastercodes.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:56 AM
33
Q: Auto-detecting dead links within the Stack Exchange network

Sidharth GhoshalI was exploring this question. The answer in particular links to a CS Theory question (that I assume was similar or the same) that had been deleted/moved. I imagine that there A LOT of questions throughout the stackexchange network that reference OTHER network posts. Would the community be int...

7
A: Auto-detecting dead links within the Stack Exchange network

Ilmari KaronenI don't know if a bot is needed, but I did write a query on the SE Data Explorer that finds links to deleted posts on other SE sites. As the screenshot shows, there were 343 such broken links on math.SE as of last weekend's SEDE update. I've fixed about a dozen of them since then, but they'll...

 
 
9 hours later…
4:33 PM
Search returns 9 posts with math.uga.edu/~pollack (4 on MO, 5 on MSE). Probably replacement with pollack.uga.edu will work in most cases - but it is certainly better to include full citation.
I have just edited this post: math.stackexchange.com/posts/515415/revisions
 

« first day (10 days earlier)      last day (742 days later) »