« first day (383 days earlier)      last day (4430 days later) » 

06:00
@Cerberus Then we both will have the same phone, which is not nice!
 
4 hours later…
09:42
I did tell her anyway, and she is going to buy it, exactly the same phone and the same color. Pish.
10:41
@Gigili Haha, you are too kind!
On the other hand, I think it is kind of cool for sisters to have the same phone.
It's like, "yo, dude, we're sisters, we're the coolest, and we have the bestest phones".
 
2 hours later…
12:18
@Cerberus Or "yo, dude, there were no other phones so we had to buy exactly the same phone."
It's really cheap now. I saw one at $350.
 
4 hours later…
16:12
@Gigili But everyone knows that's not true.
@Gigili Yay!
It's € 335 here.
 
4 hours later…
20:24
@Gigili Why? If you have the same phone it'll be easier to understand each other!
 
1 hour later…
21:33
@Mechanicalsnail Except if you use the same phone for several morphemes, like American can/can('t)...
21:57
@Cerberus But if you're going to use a different phone for each morpheme, it's hard to fit them all between your shoulder and your ear.
You don't need to use them all at once, silly.
You can just have the rest follow you in a train or something.
I wonder whether Americans think they use the same phone for can and can't.
They do complain about having to ask several times.
I wonder whether they emphasise the "right" interpretation by a slightly different pronunciation, like adding the t back in, or by saying yes/no, I can('t).
Thank goodness you edited that last remark. I was staring at it wondering what THE heck you could possibly mean.
Hehe.
I will leave you half sentences more often.
The main this is that A
22:12
Oh, now you're just teasing!
You don't say.
yes I do.
Are you trying to get back at me by posting the second half of a sentence?
All of my sentences are the second half of a sentence.
as Douglas Hoftstadter said.
yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
You really are
22:19
and so's your mother.
Do you think Carlo expects an answer to the question he just asked me?
in fact Quine, not Hofstadter. My mistake. I also misspelt the latter's name at the same time as making the misattribution.
22:42
Hey @Cerberus are you there?
@DavidWallace Oh, yes?
@DavidWallace I don't know, it is a bit weird.
Requesting your expertise. I seem to have a flagged remark in the math chat room. Which is odd, because I haven't said anything there for weeks.
Is there any way I can tell what the remark is?
Umm I don't know.
Perhaps?
In your notifications, perhaps?
If I try to click the icon that's telling me I've got flags, it says "no flags".
Oh...
I really have no experience with this.
22:45
I have no new notifications.
You suspended me, and then there was something I could click on to see what for.
That's all I know.
Nothing like this happened to me when my remark to Jez in the ELU room got flagged last week.
I wish I could tell you more, but I am ignorant.
Never mind. I'm sure it will come out in the wash eventually. It just seems so odd, when it's not a room that I use a whole lot.
I'm wondering whether it's the same person who has been downvoting me incessantly lately.
Hmm could be?
He may have found some old line that he found offensive.
22:47
I seem to have been receiving a lot of downvotes since Tom and I last fought. Not that I'm drawing any conclusions about who the downvoter might be.
I was suspended for saying "Iphones are gay" six hours after the fact.
Tom Tchrist?
Hmm. A couple of days ago, he called me a dick. Today, he called me a nut. Next time he calls me a nut, I shall have the complete set.
I thought it was a bit OTT that he called Barrie stupid though.
He can be rude.
Rude enough to cross lines.
He crossed mine too.
Did he insult you specifically?
I respect him less since then.
He pretended I didn't exist for like 4 days.
All the while talking in the main room and not replying.
So yes, then I started feeling offended.
22:50
Maybe he had "ignore"d you for some reason.
Nope.
I even had someone else apologise to him for me.
Ignored it.
Oh, and last week, he said I might become a proper person.
The suddenly he started talking to me again as though nothing had happened.
Yeah, I remember that.
He said something else offensive about me recently; I can't remember what, now.
No doubt.
22:52
I shouldn't have engaged him on the "been to" question, I guess, but it seemed so unfair.
I don't look at him as an equal any more.
But other than that everything's fine.
I am finding the ELU chat room a whole lot less enjoyable nowadays.
I have been waiting for him to leave, but he seems to lurk there 24x7.
I wonder whether he realises how offensive he's being, or whether he thinks his behaviour is normal.
Can't you just find a modus vivendi?
You can't fix people here.
It's not going to happen.
True. I was very annoyed by his answer to the WH question.
Oh, and I didn't know whether chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/6325541#6325541 was directed at me.
What did he say?
@DavidWallace Why do you think it might be?
22:57
Oh, I had posted a comment that I say "hw" in "wh" words. Then his answer said that nobody says "hw" in "wh" words, or something. Silly of me to be offended by it, of course, but I felt it was worthy of a downvote.
It could be directed at me, although I don't understand it (nor do I care to).
@DavidWallace Yeah, that is annoying!
I know how you feel.
So I just can't be bothered going to any chat room where he is present.
Then again, it is some person on the internet being rude. Now you know what to expect of him, so can adjust your way of dealing with him, right?
Yes, but I can't be bothered. That's the key point.
You can just ignore whichever comment from him you dislike.
And whichever line.
23:00
Yes, I know. And I can't be bothered.
Is not doing something a bother?
So watch me not doing it.
Hehe.
Meanwhile, Carlo keeps asking me questions, about New Zealand, about Simchona (no idea why), about why I'm not in the chat room. I don't know whether I should answer him, or just stay out.
He's inactive, by the way.
@DavidWallace Just ignore him if his questions bother you.
23:02
Oh, no, mostly they don't.
Never give in to attention-seeking that makes you feel uncomfortable, or you're only feeding it.
But I can't answer without risking having Tom jump out at me.
Put him on ignore?
For half an hour or so.
I don't need to. I'm happy not to read his remarks.
Maybe I should open a one-on-one room with Carlo, just to answer his questions.
Otherwise, Tom will either demand that I define "vowel" all over again, or make more offensive remarks about Torah devotees.
You are saying he doesn't bother you, and yet you are jumping through hoops to not be bothered by him.
I think leaving a room for, say, a day can be a good way to cool off, but eventually you have to get back in.
23:08
I reserve the right to be irrational and self-contradictory. It wouldn't be the first time.
Hehe.
You woman!
Don't flag me.
Speaking of irrational and self-contradictory, it amused me that he was citing quotations with "degli Medici" less than an hour after claiming they never existed.
Exactly.
And ignored my referring to them.
But then I am used to that.
I stopped caring.
Thank goodness we have this rant room.
Hehe.
Linguistics aka Rant.
23:14
That flag has disappeared off my main chat screen. Maybe it wasn't for me. But I've never seen one before.
Weird.
Oh well, if I can be irrational and self-contradictory, I suppose it would be inconsistent of me not to extend the same allowance to our friend.
Hehe.
Now you're inconsistent.
Inconsistent is my middle name.
23:57
Every other day?

« first day (383 days earlier)      last day (4430 days later) »