9:30 PM
@Vikas I see similar conversations about writing, illustration, game design, etc. Any profession that commodifies an activity which we identify as creative, falls prey to our pop culture beliefs about creativity --both internalized by the creators and from outside via clients/employers/purchasers-- which is very understandably frustrating.
Obviously creative professions (all professions are creative, but only some are recognized as such) are treated as simultaneously so glamorous and fulfilling that monetary compensation should be unnecessary ("doing it for love of the craft") and also as labor which only an elite few are congenitally able to perform (celebrity "talent" rather than "skill"). This leads to fewer formal avenues of support and encouragement for "creative" professionals compared to those in other fields.
Check out the conversations happening in writer spaces (Twitter is a good place to see a professional sphere's personal conversations publicly). Authors forge mutual admiration societies to encourage and support each other and share insights, because there's no formal spaces for that function in their profession. Writers like John Scalzi, Ursula Vernon, and Nnedi Okorafor talk about their process and the stress involved and where they think it comes from and what it means and how they handle it.
The expectations of editors and publishers, the role of agents as a buffer between authors and the rough edge of capitalism, and whether or not writer's block is really a thing, are common topics of conversation that all encompass their version of the graphic you linked above--and the diversity of experience they share is a good remedy for thinking that it's all the same for everybody.
Or look at illustrators or animators or video game designers talking about their deadlines, they've got a ton of pressure to turn out high-quality "creative" content very quickly with minimal support. Some thrive, some cope, some quit, some find lower-pressure spaces outside the exploitative but more visible and lucrative "mainstream" profession avenues.
Now, there IS an unfortunate false-expectations factor in a lot of "creative" professions: people get told "do what you love and you'll never feel like you're working" and that's just wrong. Whatever we're doing to earn money to keep ourselves and our loved ones alive, is going to get stressful because there's pressure and external expectations involved which we don't get when we're doing it as an amateur hobby.
I see a lot of people these days saying "No, don't do what you love as your day job because you'll fall out of love with it when you're forced to do it in order to eat."
Me, I'm a print-focused graphic designer (books, posters, brochures, etc) not because I love it (though I do enjoy the shapes it makes my brain twist into) but because I think making beautiful things that help people communicate with each other is an important service that I'm proud to offer to my local community.
I'm not in love with the thing I do, but with the effect it produces, and that's a very dramatic difference for me. If I were doing it for the act of creating, I'd be frustrated every time a client wanted me to change something.
3