If it's about organization/reorging/layoffs/compensation changes etc., often the entire reason companies bring in external consultants is to implement such a decision, i.e. it's a fait-accompli, then have token 'listening' sessions to pretend everyone 'bought in' and diffuse blame. Especially when that decision is unpopular or long-term destructive. How do know the management have the long-term best interests at heart, or aren't planning to bail after a management buyout/ strategic sale/ IPO?
Much corporate behavior isn't (long-term) rational, let alone about improving things or optimality. Stand back and ask yourself Cui bono/Which group of people stands to gain most from the change, and which to lose?