CMC: Reverse a list without the built-in code-golf

room topic changed to CMC: For those too lazy to post on main [code-challenge] [code-golf]

@Wezl Husk, 4 bytes: F`:ø

But since a builtin isn't very well-defined, I'm voting to close your challenge. I'm also downvoting it to teach you a lesson.

no, the entire point of the room is for challenges that wouldn't go well on main

like ones that rely on bad definitions

whether it's a builtin is defined entirely by my opinion

I was joking

I don't know how to downvote you, so I simply flagged your message as spam/offensive

well I'm upvoting it to make sure I don't learn a lesson :)

I'll also pin the latest challenges

Ok

Yay I'm in the first page of this room's transcript

@user can you explain this answer?

Husk is really interesting but I can't even run haskell :(

In Haskell, it'd be foldl (flip (:)) []

of course, I'm making a new language that's going to be better than haskell in every way, but still

@user oh nice

that's very readable

Basically, you just go from left to right prepending elements to the accumulator

@Wezl Whlplash? :P

no, colon

I kinda want to make a language that combines APL and Rust/Haskell

@Wezl no, comma :P

which is a rewrite of concurr

@Wezl Is the repo public?

Oh cool, did you finish concurr?

no because there's nothing in the repo

@user finish as in I'm done, yes

Cool

but I didn't ever create a full implementation

I should make a minimal extension to racket/base and tell everyone I've made a new language

CMC nevermind I shouldn't encourage sandbox sniping :/

CMC: Remove non-alphanumeric

Scala: _.replaceAll([^A-Za-z0-9],"")

wow, typical scala, having character set literals

tbf I'm against even having character literals, too

Oh wait I forgot double quotes around the regex

oh so it doesn't have them

I misread "having character set literals" as "not having character set literals"

Yeah Scala doesn't have a lot of that weirdness, other than XML (which is removed in Scala 3 anyway)

jelly, fØB

ez