« first day (3114 days earlier)      last day (1906 days later) » 

12:34 AM
twitter.com/tinkertim/status/1095725061263233026?s=09 almost replied 'thats silly, be a dog…' 🐕
 
 
2 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
4:22 AM
@JourneymanGeek whoa what
 
@allquixotic got matrix up?
 
yep
 
 
3 hours later…
7:59 AM
Hmm
Super rough mockup of my planned build
Keeping my 980.Might be adding a cheapish dodgy SSD for temp storage and moving over my 3tb drive for now
Ram is subject to change - went with the cheapest 16 gb sticks I could find at my usual hardware place
The case I want is the HAF XB Evo but it's not listed
 
8:28 AM
Anyone has an idea wtf UAS is (as an error) on a Cisco 887?
> Total UAS: 17 17
 
Google says unavailable seconds
 
ty
line is fooked. No wonder, is in train station. ><
why oh why does csv preview not work in outlook :(
 
9:10 AM
morning
 
Quick question: Can changing the system time in Windows have any unfortunate consequences? I'm planning on changing it back later.
 
HTTPS websites might not load correctly for the period
depends how far out you put the clock
 
@Burgi 01.01.2018
 
yeah you might have issues loading HTTPS sites
 
@StewieGriffin not really. If you have any time based trial software - the end result might be unpredictable and what @Burgi said
 
9:23 AM
My goal is to change the output of the =today() function in Excel. The workbook is locked with a password, so I can't change anything about the functions itself. Does anyone know if this might work?
Or if there's another way to go about it?
I have to replicate the output from a previous date, but I have to make Excel believe it's 2018.
 
Erf. I guess test it
That's a hacky but legit thing to do
And harmless.
 
I will, I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't ruin anything.
 
I've had time drift to 1970 on older pcs due to dead cmos batteries
And I tried the changing the date to get around a time limited license for software for an assignment that really needed to be done (I got a new license latetmr)
 
@JourneymanGeek and that worked?
 
Much to my joy and horror
 
9:37 AM
:)
 
@StewieGriffin in a vm....
 
10:15 AM
wtf
 
0
Q: Feature-Request: Rename search bar to 'Question Bar' and auto-suggest questions (with answers)

djsmiley2kRight now when 'searching' - you type in a question or term, hit enter, go to another page, sigh, retype your question etc. If you happen to have clicked the ask question button, and start typing your question it's already helpfully suggesting what your question might be and showing you the ques...

 
10:38 AM
So I shared this draft with someone and here's what they had to say:
> Article? You mean ad? You know, ads trying to look like an articles are an old thing now. Even South Park made an episode about them...

And if you think Apple give a shit about your privacy you are beyond naive. Every big company collects as much data as possible, as it is just stupid not to do so. Hell, Apple probably has the biggest collection of biometric data on the planet.
Thoughts?
(cc @bwd)
 
@rahuldottech for most part no one cares about the individual. Only the demographic
Apple wants to sell you hardware so it's a great marketing pitch
 
11:11 AM
@Bob what are the data costs in Australia like these days? I've managed to get an 80 GB UK contract for £30 a month that includes AU roaming for £5 a day, my other one has 15GB with free roaming and was considering upgrading that before I travel if its cheaper than getting a local sim
 
Bob
@FMLCat Telstra, Optus or Vodafone? :P
Vodafone has 30/$30, 50/$45, 60/$50, 100/$60, 150/$80
$50+ gets 1.5Mbps unlimited after the cap
Optus has 200/$60 and 500/$80 broadband only plans
Telstra's still the most expensive, 30/$49, 60/$59, 90/$89, $49+ gets 1.5Mbps unlimited.
@FMLCat Basically: I'd say not bad, as long as you're fine with 12month contracts.
There's prepaid plans too but they tend to be a fair bit less GB/$
How much data do you want/need?
Very different options if you need 30 GB vs 100 GB
 
11:35 AM
 
 
3 hours later…
2:48 PM
Lol
 
3:15 PM
Rich Moy on February 14, 2019

After an exciting end to 2018, we kicked this year off with the first “hackathon” in Stack Overflow’s 10-year history. Unlike a traditional hackathon, it wasn’t just for our developers. Any employee working on our products or directly with the Stack Overflow community was encouraged to participate, which is why we dubbed the event a “Make-A-Thon.”

Employees from our engineering, design, and support teams spent a full week working on projects outside of their typical day-to-day responsibilities. For our inaugural Make-A-Thon, participants brainstormed improvements to our power user and moderator experience on Stack Overflow. …

 
@Blogbot wtf... do you read your own crap before posting it?
"there aren't any goals...."
"... apart from these two..."
 
It's not it's fault ;l
 
the 737 and the 777 are the better aircraft for the modern world
 
Dec 19 '17 at 4:33, by bwDraco
The A380 is supposed to be cheaper per passenger to run at capacity than the 787, but filling ~500 seats is hard.
 
3:23 PM
it is also limited by ground infrastructure
 
Yup. Airports had to set up special terminals for them.
 
Bob
@Burgi No love for the 787? :P
 
@Bob i forgot about it
 
@Bob has it stopped catching fire?
 
i guess in the late 80s/early 90s when the plans for the A380 were drawn up it seemed like a good idea economically
 
Bob
3:30 PM
@JourneymanGeek After the first year or so, yea.
I'm not sure I've ever been on a 777, but I do much prefer the 787 over the 737.
 
i think most of the planes i have been on are 737-300/400s or airbus A340s
i'll be catching my first jumbo in april
 
@Burgi Bring a big net!
 
heh
 
I've been on several Boeing 777-300ER flights before.
 
i don't think the tail number has been announced yet...
although i know my seat and where the exits are
 
4:15 PM
do anybod here uses chocolatey for windows? i cant seem to uninstall a certain package that just keeps popping up everytime i search for it after uninstalling it "succesfully" according to chocolatey
 
I've used it but wasn't terribly impressed
ISTR some weirdness around install/uninstall
 
4:34 PM
also seems to be a lack of info on the details for the install, which is important in many cases
 
4:49 PM
The first AMD high-performance mobile processors are here: wccftech.com/…
Full-power laptop processors, not the low-power 10-25W stuff commonly found on thin-and-light machines.
 
5:32 PM
@abobakrdy I don't use it, but I was always curious about it. We use PDQ for installing software to workstations, so that it's repeatable and done by the tech
 
5:56 PM
What is anyone's thoughts on using Ubuntu 18.04 for a small home business?
 
6:20 PM
@CanadianLuke looked into PDQ but i see its not free.ill just manually install the one extension this time
 
 
2 hours later…
8:14 PM
@OvieAdese Using Debian, works very similarly. Working well, but a learning curve if you've never used bash
@abobakrdy They have free versions as well, they just don't unlock the package library, so you need to compile your own packages to distribute
 
8:46 PM
Fancy NVMe storage on USB 3.1 Gen 2?
(got one too many USB 3.1 Gen 2 portable SSDs right now :P)
I'm actually more curious about random I/O performance, the kind of thing that NVMe excels at. With a high-performance SATA SSD in a USB 3.1 Gen 2 enclosure, IOPS can be bottlenecked by the underlying drive.
Nov 27 '18 at 20:52, by bwDraco
That StarTech USB 3.1 Gen 2 enclosure is awesome enough that I actually got a second one for my (currently unused) Samsung SSD 850 EVO. Just like the one used for the 850 PRO and connected to this laptop, it supports TRIM and pushed upwards of 550 MB/s sequential reads.
550 MB/s is plenty for me... but being able to push a full 1 GB/s on mainstream hardware has its allure (most newer machines have USB 3.1 Gen 2, even my father's cheap HP desktop).
(on the front panel: two USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-A ports and one USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C port)
 
9:22 PM
Is bash script male or female? superuser.com/questions/1405827/automating-task
 
lul
@Biswapriyo To answer your question: Given that the writer is Russian... скрипт ("script") is male.
 

« first day (3114 days earlier)      last day (1906 days later) »