It just gives me a BS error message about being unable to verify the URL and when I google for it, I only find people that used the public URL instead of the private one
The .ics link in my Google Calendar is working fine. I can download my calendar just fine from there and I can also import that file into Outlook, but I can't open the URL directly in Outlook
And I assume that I would need that to have a continuous sync going on
I'm just interested in understanding this process, because we would like to offer a similar interface in our web application
I donated about 50 times when I was younger. I gave up when they banned me because I'd been on holiday where there was malaria (and yes, I did take the appropriate pills).
@JourneymanGeek It was a long time ago. I have no recollection of what the pills were. I can't even remember where I went on that trip, must have been SE Asia. Perhaps Malaysia?
Most of the temporary disqualification factors for blood donations are based on risk.
> You may not be able to donate blood if: you have had a serious illness or major surgery in the past you have had complicated dental work (it is safe to donate blood 24 hours after having a filling or seven days after a simple extraction) you have recently come into contact with an infectious disease you have had certain immunisations within the last four weeks you are currently on a hospital waiting list, or waiting to have tests You should not give blood if: you have a chesty cough, sore throat or an active cold sore
@qasdfdsaq If I needed a blood transfusion I would hope that any blood given to me was uncontaminated. That is exactly why I didn't donate when I was told not to and why I hope people don't lie when asked the appropriate questions :/
If I knew I needed an operation I might even think about donating my own blood in advance for them to use on me ;)
@DavidPostill But if there was no uncontaminated blood available, and you had the choice of small risk of contamination vs. death, which would you choose?
> "some of our competitors are cheap engineers who have never been to a recording studio. You can't just stick someone's name on a headphone that doesn't know anything about sound."
In any case the question was about giving blood not receiving it. Are you saying that people should just give contaminated blood and to hell with the recipients?
@HackToHell It may have been 12 months (which appears to be normal). Like I said it was a long time ago.
No, I'm saying donors should be allowed to donate blood that may have a small risk of contamination providing it is marked and treated as such. Any and all donations have some risk anyway, and when there is no objectively demonstratable fault with the donated blood, particularly given widespread shortages, it's better to have some than not.
Similarly I'll happily eat foods marked as bad/expired if it meant an alternative to starving, and IMO they should loosen the rules on donating food to the needy as well.
@JourneymanGeek Donating blood tends to be, by definition, not a dick move though
And despite the exclusions, who is to say the donor wouldn't lie about having visited a country with disease risk for example?
That's why donations are all tested after the fact, at which point you can put the whole risk/no risk issue to rest because there's a precise result to tell you.
Flush it down the drain. Feed it to the rats/vampires/etc.
Tell the person to not come back again.
They test it anyway, and none of the risk factors are absolute.
They obviously exclude people with HIV, and anyone who's had sex with someone with HIV, but a good proportion of people living with HIV don't know it. They're not excluded.
@qasdfdsaq LOL. "That's why there's testing...". Then perhaps only dead people should be allowed to donate blood. "The only way to confirm a diagnosis of CJD is by brain biopsy or autopsy."
100% of people with CJD don't know it and tests can't detect it.
Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (/ˈkrɔɪtsfɛlt ˈjɑːkoʊb/ KROITS-felt YAH-kohb) or CJD is a degenerative neurological disease that is incurable and invariably fatal. CJD is at times called a human form of mad cow disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy or BSE). However, given that BSE is believed to be the cause of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob (vCJD) disease in humans, the two are often confused.
CJD is caused by an infectious agent called a prion. Prions are misfolded proteins that replicate by converting their properly folded counterparts, in their host, to the same misfolded structure they possess. CJD...
If you can get diagnosed, you can know you have it.
(Also your own quote says a brain biopsy can confirm a diagnosis... which again, lets the person know)
> This procedure may be dangerous for the individual, and the operation does not always obtain tissue from the affected part of the brain. Because a correct diagnosis of CJD does not help the person, a brain biopsy is discouraged unless it is needed to rule out a treatable disorder.
From the wikipedia you quoted: "As of 2010, screening tests to identify infected asymptomatic individuals, such as blood donors, are not yet available,
That's absolutely no different from depression, autism, or various other neurological disorders. Does not mean you have to be dead to know you have it.
You can't test the blood of random donors to see if they have CJD. Which invalidates your previous statement "That's why donations are all tested after the fact, at which point you can put the whole risk/no risk issue to rest because there's a precise result to tell you."
That may be wrong but so is your ""That's why donations are all tested after the fact, at which point you can put the whole risk/no risk issue to rest because there's a precise result to tell you."
Contaminated blood includes contaminations other than malaria. Your first question to me was "Would you rather die of exsanguination than risk having contaminated bloood though?". I don't see the word malaria in that question ;)
@qasdfdsaq Apart from you of course "a member of your immediate family has had Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) – a rare condition that affects the nervous system and causes brain damage "
Quite how you got from "You should not give blood if a member of your immediate family has had CJD" to "Then perhaps only dead people should be allowed to donate blood. 100% of people with CJD don't know it and tests can't detect it." is beyond me
@Bob Yeah, most people didn't know it existed at all before vCJD hit the news
Perhaps you should check your understanding of English. By definition a person is a member of his own family. A person cannot be a member of someone else's family.
@qasdfdsaq well, I've known CJD existed for a while, but I've only ever heard of vCJD apparently. And that's a apparently <5% of total CJD cases. So, yea, pretty low.
@DavidPostill ...that is kinda dodging the point there though. Member of family has had CJD => possibly genetic => you are at risk => you should not donate.
@bob "That's why donations are all tested after the fact, at which point you can put the whole risk/no risk issue to rest because there's a precise result to tell you." was what I didn't agree with.
> Local Councils have taken responsibility to deal with electronic waste for their areas and play an important role in the recycling of all kinds of waste products, like plastics, glass, metals and electronic waste.
eWaste Recycling’s drop off services are run in partnership with local councils across Australia