« first day (463 days earlier)      last day (4177 days later) » 

6:00 PM
@JonEricson tbh I find christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/9763/… to be a problematic question in general. Thoughts?
 
@waxeagle I think it needs a source to the claim. "I have some unverified information" suggests Skeptics.SE, but I'd like to see (or be pointed to) where the asker got that info.
Nothing about the incident here:
Quedlinburg () is a town located north of the Harz mountains, in the district of Harz in the west of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. In 1994 the medieval court and the old town was set on the UNESCO world heritage list. Until 2007 it was the capital of the district of Quedlinburg. Some places in town with Romanesque architecture are part of the holiday route Romanesque Road, such as St Servatius' church at the castles hill, St Wigbert's church down the valley and St Maries church on the Montsion's hill ('Muenzenberg'). History The town of Quedlinburg is known since at least the early 9th c...
 
6:21 PM
@JonEricson yes. and honestly "did x really happen" isn't really in our purview
tbh if Luther/Lutherans burned folks the anabaptists look like they might be the most likely
but unlikely:
> In Catholic countries the Anabaptists, as a rule, were executed by burning at the stake, in Lutheran and Zwinglian states generally by beheading or drowning.
but a cursory google search doesn't pull anything about any potential incident
ah, searching specifically for Quedlinburg leads to 130 witches burned in a day, apparently, but nothing firm, no actual historical accounts are popping
considering the Germans burned somewhere around 25-30k over 300 years it's not out of the realm of possibility
 
6:38 PM
@waxeagle And also shows that there wasn't anything particularly unusual about Lutherans at the time. It would be like saying that Buddhists eat lots of rice, which is true, but doesn't tell us much about Buddhism.
Yeah, "Closed as Not Constructive" belies the need for migration, @Jon. But we do indicate questions that can't be migrated on the close dialog now, so perhaps this will reduce confusion. — Shog9 32 mins ago
 
The witch trials in the Early Modern period were a period of witch hunts between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries, when across Early Modern Europe (though largely excluding the Iberian Peninsula and Italy as well as the areas of Eastern Orthodoxy and Islam), and to some extent in the European colonies in North America, there was a widespread hysteria that malevolent Satanic witches were operating as an organized threat to Christendom. Those accused of witchcraft were portrayed as being worshippers of the Devil, who engaged in such acts as malevolent sorcery, and orgies at meetings k...
section: nine million women
 
@waxeagle "a figure more than a hundred times too high and based on an 18th-century estimate"
 
@JonEricson yeah some preposterous research there. and the 133 in a day comes with equally dubious fact checking
 
@waxeagle " Based on records of the 29 year period 1569 to 1589, he estimated about 40 executions in this period, and extrapolated to about 133 executions per century."
Crap. Now I have an answer.
 
there was a different city with a bunch, but it was only like 122 in the whole year...
@JonEricson yeah, you'd have to convince him to reask (or ask yourself) on history or skeptics
 
6:48 PM
@waxeagle I just left a comment instead. I don't think Skeptics would take it.
 
@JonEricson no I don't think they would
 
7:14 PM
It's way too late now, but I just realized this BH question probably belongs on C.SE:
6
Q: When did Jesus change his view on preaching to Gentiles?

Muke TeverIn John 10:16 Jesus says (ESV quoted): And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd. The common belief, as I understand it, is that this refers to the division between Jews and Gentiles. ...

 
@JonEricson See first comment here: slacktiverse.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/…
 
I wonder if there's a related question here that I can point folks to.
 
(The main post itself is also good reading, but completely irrelevant to the point at hand.)
 
@TRiG Ah yes. You posted that a while ago, I think.
It occurs to me that the orthodox Christianity is different in that a particular historical event must have occurred in order for our religion to have any value.
(I wrote a blog post on that. ;-)
 
@JonEricson not aware of one right off. It's an interesting doctrinal point.
he missed another good example too
but it's in your answer
good answer from a hermeneutics perspective and I'm not convinced that a doctrinal POV would have done better
 
7:28 PM
@waxeagle The question must come up a lot in Google searches (yay!) since it keeps gathering answers. I think I need to ask a separate question about the reason Jesus seems to call the woman and her daughter "dogs". And maybe figure out a way to ask the doctrinal question here.
 
7:39 PM
@JonEricson odd thing to find in google searches but I guess it is one of the "contradictions" perhaps that people might point to
 
7:49 PM
in V'dibarta Bam, Nov 7 at 0:07, by TRiG
Quick question: What do you think of this interesting take on the meaning of Passover?
29 mins ago, by Jon Ericson
It occurs to me that the orthodox Christianity is different in that a particular historical event must have occurred in order for our religion to have any value.
I think the reactions in that chat room suggest that they don't see that as a difference. They too tie their religion to a historical event.
(Or, perhaps, an ahistorical event; much as the Christians do.)
(But, then, I would say that, wouldn't I?)
in V'dibarta Bam, Nov 9 at 23:08, by TRiG
But then, I treat such stories as interesting things to think about and, occasionally, to learn from, not as inspired texts.
 
@El'endia - npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2012/11/28/166059579/… The chickend story gets even cooler...
 
@AffableGeek new from ballywood, a movie filmed entirely by chickens.
 

« first day (463 days earlier)      last day (4177 days later) »